Why Trump Lost and How? A Rhetorical Explanation
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3757602 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Roderick P Hart (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 66 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 7-27 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002764221996760 |
| OpenAlex | W3134021676 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 13 |
| Referencias citadas | 23 |
Discovering why the 2020 election turned out as it did will, given the complexities of American politics, take considerable time. Discovering how Trump lost and how Biden won will take longer. This article presents an initial foray in the latter direction by subjecting the rhetoric of the campaign to computerized language analysis via the DICTION program. In doing so, this study is the most recent outgrowth of the Campaign Mapping Project, begun at the University of Texas in Austin in 1995 and designed to produce comparative rhetorical data about presidential campaigns from 1948 to the present. The argument being made here is that Donald Trump lost the election by making excessive use of what Richard Hofstadter calls the Paranoid Style. In addition, Trump made exaggerated claims about abstract and unprovable conspiracies, all of which seemed derivative to voters worried about their health and their jobs in 2020. Joe Biden, in contrast, stressed Commonality-the need for shared purpose during a dangerous and dispiriting time. Biden also spoke directly of and to the people, thereby taking a page out of Trump's own 2016 playbook. In many ways, Donald Trump's self-preoccupations made him blind to the needs of the electorate, a habit that developed over the course of his presidency and that ultimately cost him his job
Argument (complex analysis) · Art · Diction · Linguistics · Literature · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Presidential election · Presidential system · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Style (visual arts) · Law · Philosophy · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Media and Politics
« “Le jour où la démocratie meurt” ? Équilibre des pouvoirs et démocratie aux États-Unis à l’ère du “big lie” »
Connecting the American People
Assessing Wartime Leaders' Motives
On measurement of distances between texts in dictionary-based content analysis
Charismatic rhetoric, perceptions of charisma and narcissism, and voting behavior
Putting Discourses About the War in Ukraine on a Map
Donald Trump's Words
Feeling protected
Radiating Truthiness
On Rhetorical Paramnesia
Are U.S. Presidents Becoming Less Rhetorically Complex? Evaluating the Integrative Complexity of Joe Biden and Donald Trump in Historical Context
Dissatisfied democrats, but democrats nonetheless?” Unraveling the democratic paradox between populism and preference for alternative political systems
Masks and Emasculation
The age of Twitter
Make America Great Again
The Twitter Presidency
Donald J. Trump and the Rhetoric of White Ambivalence
Obama, Trump, and Reflections on the Rhetoric of Political Change
Campaign talk
Polls and Elections Trump, Twitter, and Public Dissuasion
Donald Trump and the Return of the Paranoid Style
The Power of the Presidency to Hurt”
Donald J. Trump and the rhetoric of ressentiment
Reckless Rhetoric? Compliance Pessimism and International Order in the Age of Trump
In search of enemies
Ambiguous specificity
Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion
The "Tweet Politics" of President Trump
Going negative
Disruption, Demonization, Deliverance, and Norm Destruction
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2,6 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 13 |