Exploring the roles and challenges of national development experts on the Rohingya crisis in Bangladesh
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3886643 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Bulbul Siddiqi (0000-0002-5758-4209, North South University), Palash Kamruzzaman (0000-0002-6363-7186, South Wales Business School, University of South Wales, Treforest Campus, UK, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 35 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 787-803 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Development in Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0961-4524 • E-ISSN: 1364-9213 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09614524.2025.2457050 |
| OpenAlex | W4407189619 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
Bangladesh hosts nearly one million Rohingyas who live in several congested camps in Cox’s Bazar, making it the largest refugee camp in the world. Many NGOs and several UN agencies support the Rohingyas with essential basic needs. The enormity and complex nature of the crisis have created spaces for practitioners, researchers, academics, and activists to get involved in the quest for a dignified and sustainable solution for the Rohingyas. Based on 25 interviews with various “experts” (including academics, researchers, and activists) working on the Rohingya crisis, this paper explores to what extent the “experts” can play a meaningful role in resolving this crisis. Our evidence suggests that a nonchalant, non-responsive practice limits the roles of “experts” in making meaningful contributions towards effective policy formulation for this crisis. Traditionally, there remains a lack of evidence-based policy formation in various sectors in Bangladesh. The case of the Rohingya is no exception. The lack of evidence-based policy culture makes it difficult for the experts, although “international”: experts enjoy some advantages over national experts
Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Ethnology · Political science · Sociology · South asia · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Cambodian History and Society · International Development and Aid
The Will to Improve
Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?
Thematic Analysis
The Colonial Legacy and the Rise of Social Assistance in the Global South
Why national development experts are not included in development policy‐making and practice
“The Local Consultant Will Not Be Credible”
Adventures in Aidland
Investigating the process of evidence-informed health policymaking in Bangladesh
Refugee Policy in Brazil (1995–2010)
We have heard you but we are not changing anything”
Adventures in Aidland. The anthropology of professionals in international development
Foreign Aid and National Ownership in Mali and Ghana
Understanding the motivations and roles of national development experts in Ghana
Neglected challenges to evidence-based policy-making
Navigating the shift in Bangladeshi host community’s perceptions towards the Rohingya refugees
Challenges and dilemmas of social cohesion between the Rohingya and host communities in Bangladesh
A Space for Unlearning? A Relational Perspective on North–South Development Research
Boundaries in Shaping the Rohingya Identity and the Shifting Context of Borderland Politics
Humanitarianism, National Security, and the Rohingya Refugee Policy of Bangladesh
Finding a durable solution to Bangladesh’s Rohingya refugee problem
Exploring challenges and politics of knowledge production in the global South - Evidence from Bangladesh’s aid and development sector
Rohingya Ethnic Muslim Minority and the 1982 Citizenship Law in Burma
Authority and Expertise
Aid and development by design
De-centring the 'White Gaze' of Development
Refusing the Development NGO? Departure, Dismissal, and Misrecognition in Angolan Development Interventions
Linguistic Capital and Inequality in Aid Relations
Mercenaries, Missionaries and Misfits
Local in Practice
Donors dealing with 'aid effectiveness' inconsistencies
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |