Can domestic resource mobilisation by civil society organisations (CSOs) open up civic space in the Global South
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3887362 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Emmanuel Kumi (0000-0001-8318-8499, University of Ghana, autor de correspondencia), Rachel Hayman (University of Oxford) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 35 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 669-687 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-05-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Development in Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0961-4524 • E-ISSN: 1364-9213 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09614524.2025.2487791 |
| OpenAlex | W4409314033 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
In response to political and funding pressures, civil society organisations (CSOs) in the Global South are seeking to generate more funding from local sources. This article explores whether domestic resource mobilisation can also open up civic space by reviewing the evidence on the relationship between domestic resource mobilisation and civic space in the Global South. This article adopts a scoping review methodology and follows a literature search and screening process where 25 studies were synthesised. In addition, we draw on primary data from interviews with CSO representatives in Burkina Faso, India, Ethiopia, and Kenya to examine whether and how domestic resource mobilisation can improve the operating environment for civil society. We find that domestic resource mobilisation enhances CSOs’ legitimacy and credibility at the grassroots by increasing downward accountability, albeit with trade-offs. CSOs use domestic resource mobilisation as a platform for engaging citizens and opening spaces for collective action, which increases civic participation and demands for social accountability. We further find that political actors are more receptive towards CSOs with a local base, although this receptiveness depends on the context and the functions of CSOs. Finally, we identify some potentially negative aspects of domestic resource mobilisation for civic space
Civil society · Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Politics · Resource mobilization · Social movement · International Development and Aid · Law · Public Administration · Religion, Society, and Development · Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
A scoping review of scoping reviews
Domestic resource mobilisation strategies of national non‐governmental organisations in Ghana
Social protection and formalization in low- and middle-income countries
Can Human Rights Organizations in the Global South Attract More Domestic Funding
Local resources for local rights? The Mumbai fundraiser's dilemma
Asset-based and citizen-led development
Disrupting and democratising development
The politics of repressing environmentalists as agents of foreign influence
Universal values, foreign money
Who survived? Ethiopia's regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs
Civil Society under the Law ‘On Foreign Agents’
In search of the non-profit sector. I
Aid Reduction and Local Civil Society
Aid Reduction and NGDOs’ Quest for Sustainability in Ghana
Partnerships and the Good-Governance Agenda
Hands Off My Regime! Governments’ Restrictions on Foreign Aid to Non-Governmental Organizations in Poor and Middle-Income Countries
Dangerous Correlations
NGOs, States, and Donors Revisited
Downward Accountability in Unequal Alliances
Angels of mercy or smiling western invaders? Community’s perception of NGOs in northwest Pakistan
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy
Defunding Dissent
Pandemic democracy
Scoping studies
The impact of Covid-19 on development assistance
Action for Children
Relations between gender-focused NGOs, advocacy work, and government
LGBT Advocacy and Transnational Funding in Singapore and Malaysia
International Interventions to Build Social Capital
Framing the Ghanaian LGBT rights debate
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |