Smells and politics of Utopia

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3896017
AutoresBabette Babich (0000-0002-4499-0718, Fordham University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2024
Volumen65
Número2
Páginas172-193
Fecha de publicación2024-05-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDiogenes (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0392-1921 • E-ISSN: 1467-7695
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0392192124000063
OpenAlexW4393095896
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas27

Utopia is nominally a 'nowhere' that is also, as Thomas More tells us, a 'good' place. Although there are competing cognate notions, the Greek description looms large in most accounts of utopia. The details of this ideal are so specified that utopic literature consists in a catalogue (and critique) of specifications. This essay draws attention to the fragrance attributed to Lucian's 'Isles of the Blest' together with Ivan Illich's attention to 'atmosphere' and to the aura and the nose along with Nietzsche's emphasis on the sense of smell. Utopic suspicion is discussed as parallels are drawn with pragmatic critiques of utopia as inherently totalitarian along with the 'good life' in political theory and the programmatic default of techno-utopic fantasy. In the historical context of 'conspiracy' and the politics of living and breathing together in community, I conclude with Illich on pax and breath

Art · Art history · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Utopia · Law · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism · Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction · Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation