NGO-academia research co-production in humanitarian settings
Opportunities and Challenges
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3897643 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michelle Lokot (0000-0002-4406-0166, Research Fellow London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine United Kingdom, autor de correspondencia), Caitlin Wake (0000-0002-3576-6298, Education and Capacity Strengthening Manager London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine United Kingdom) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 47 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 464-481 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Disasters (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0361-3666 • E-ISSN: 1467-7717 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/disa.12556 |
| PMID | 35841211 |
| OpenAlex | W4285588357 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 7 |
| Referencias citadas | 25 |
The term 'co-production' is increasingly used to describe varied forms of research partnerships, expanding from its application within the health sector to other areas. In humanitarian settings, alongside more calls for localisation and decolonising aid, research co-production is emerging as a means of tackling power dynamics within NGO (non-governmental organisation)-academia research partnerships. Based on semi-structured interviews with practitioners and academics with experience of co-producing research and participating in research partnerships, this paper presents the opportunities and challenges associated with co-producing research in humanitarian settings. The findings suggest that similar to other buzzwords in the humanitarian sector, the label of 'co-production' is sometimes uncritically applied to any kind of research partnership. The study emphasises the importance of centring power within co-produced research in humanitarian settings and suggests that while the term co-production is sometimes misappropriated, the principles underlying this concept remain essential to unravelling power hierarchies within the humanitarian sector
Business · Economics · Engineering ethics · Medical emergency · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Political science · Production (economics · Suicide prevention · Community Development and Social Impact · Engineering · Global Health and Surgery · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Medicine · Peacebuilding and International Security
Integrating research evidence in humanitarian health responses
Co-creating a decision-making framework for primary healthcare models in conflict-affected Cameroon and Nigeria
Maximising the potential of academic–practitioner collaborations in international development
Geometries of control
But We Just Need Money”
The Glaring Gap
Pacific NGOs weighing up our research capacities
Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference
The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care
Lost in the shadows
Co-production of risk knowledge and improvement of risk communication
The Rhetoric and Reality of Localisation
Using a co‐production prioritization exercise involving South Asian children, young people and their families to identify health priorities requiring further research and public awareness
Inside, outside and in‐between
The Possibilities and Limits of “Co-producing” Research
Localisation Across the Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus
The politics of co-production
Co-management and the co-production of knowledge
Co-production
A call for critical reflection on the localisation agenda in humanitarian action
Making space for co‐produced research ‘impact’
Power, Privilege and Knowledge
Crossing the great divide
The politics of co-production
NGO-researcher partnerships in global health research
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 7 |