Using practitioner surveys to measure human rights
The Human Rights Measurement Initiative's civil and political rights metrics
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3917043 |
|---|---|
| Autores | K Chad Clay (0000-0001-8276-6998, University of Georgia, autor de correspondencia), Ryan Bakker (0000-0002-7695-9467, University of Essex), Anne-Marie Brooks (Motu Economic and Public Policy Research), Anne-Marie Brook (Motu Economic and Public Policy Research), Daniel W Hill (0000-0003-4978-2085, University of Georgia), Amanda Murdie (0000-0002-6459-0594, University of Georgia) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 57 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 715-727 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022343320959688 |
| OpenAlex | W3095578618 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 12 |
| Referencias citadas | 19 |
Most cross-national datasets of civil and political rights practices have relied on internationally distributed English language secondary sources as the core source of information for their metrics. This approach has yielded data that are highly reliable, but also suffer from the fact that their information sources under-represent the overall level of abuse internationally and do so in a way that is biased across countries. The combined knowledge of the individual human rights practitioners working to directly monitor the abuses occurring within a country would likely serve to overcome much of this biased under-reporting, but it is difficult to compare that knowledge across country and cultural contexts. In this article, we discuss how we overcome these problems in the Human Rights Measurement Initiative (HRMI) civil and political rights data. Using an expert survey that contains anchoring vignettes in concert with Bayesian scaling techniques, we present a new methodology for collecting and aggregating data on the intensity and distribution of respect for eight separate civil and political rights
Civil rights · Data mining · Data science · Human rights · Measure (data warehouse) · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Statistics · Survey data collection · Computer Science · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Measuring human rights violations from an ecological perspective using a locally generated instrument
Quantifications of the Rights of the Child
The effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on human rights practices
Rights violations and international public opinion
Sport and Human Rights Issues
A latent variable approach to measuring wartime sexual violence
Hierarchical Bayesian Aldrich–McKelvey Scaling
The politics of human rights trade sanctions
How and how much does expert error matter? Implications for quantitative peace research
What states want
Estimating one-sided-killings from a robust measurement model of human rights
Innovations in concepts and measurement for the study of peace and conflict
Fulfilling Social and Economic Rights
V-Dem Codebook V9
Information Effects and Human Rights Data
State Violation of Human Rights
Political Rights and Political Liberties in Nations
The Limitations of Using Quantitative Data in Studying Human Rights Abuses
The European Common Space
Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited
Patterns of disagreement in indicators of state repression
Modeling Two Types of Peace
Choosing the Best House in a Bad Neighborhood
Information Politics Versus Organizational Incentives
Using Bayesian Aldrich‐McKelvey Scaling to Study Citizens' Ideological Preferences and Perceptions
Torture allegations as events data
Torture and the limits of democratic institutions
An Empirical Evaluation of Explanations for State Repression
Respect for Human Rights has Improved Over Time
| Obras citantes distintas | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 12 |