Lies, Damned Lies, and (Bourgeois) Statistics

Ascertaining Social Fact in Midcentury China and the Soviet Union

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3924533
AutoresArunabh Ghosh (0000-0001-9300-7997, Thales (Australia), autor de correspondencia)
Año2018
Volumen33
Número1
Páginas149-168
Fecha de publicación2018-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaOsiris (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0369-7827 • E-ISSN: 1933-8287
EditorialUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/699237
OpenAlexW2898289416
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas26

Is there a correct way to ascertain social fact? As late as the 1950s, the scientific community remained divided over this question. Its resolution involved not just epistemological and theoretical debates on the unity or disunity of statistical science but also practical considerations surrounding state-capacity building. For scientists in places like the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Soviet Union, at stake was the very ability to realize the kind of planned economic growth that socialist countries idealized. The solution they chose reformulated statistics explicitly as a social science, salvaging it from what they then dismissed as the tainted, bourgeois, and socially unproductive pursuit of mathematical statistics. This distinction—most tangibly understood as the rejection of all probabilistic methods—had implications for both the ways in which data was collected and the ways in which it was analyzed

Bourgeoisie · China · Official statistics · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Soviet union · Statistics · History of Science and Medicine · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy and History of Science