Die ursprünglichen fragestellungen hinter August schleichers Stammbaum-Theorie und Johannes Schmidts Wellen-Metapher

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3955097
AutoresJeroen Van Pottelberge (Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders & Ghent University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2003
Volumen30
Número3
Páginas301-364
Fecha de publicación2003-12-31
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHistoriographia Linguistica (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0302-5160 • E-ISSN: 1569-9781
EditorialJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/hl.30.3.04pot
OpenAlexW1485112482
IdiomaDE
Referencias citadas37

August Schleicher's genealogical tree (Stammbaum) and Johannes Schmidt's wave metaphor (Welle) are very well known linguistic concepts. At the same time there has been a widespread misunderstanding about their original meaning and the questions they were intended to deal with. Both were originally classificatory concepts, not models of language change. Schleicher, on the one hand, introduced theStammbaumby transforming hierarchical classes of Indo-European languages into successive historical stages. Schmidt, on the other hand, rejected the idea of subgrouping Indo-European languages as required by Schleicher'sStammbaum. Instead, he assumed an original continuum of languages. He described this continuum metaphorically in terms of concentric 'waves'. The interpretation of the wave image as a metaphor for the geographical spread of linguistic innovations (as has become common) is the result of later adaptations in dialectology

Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Metaphor · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistic research and analysis · Philosophy · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies