Vološinov and Cassirer
A case of plagiarism
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3955341 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mika Lähteenmäki (0000-0002-8176-244X, University of Jyväskylä, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2002 |
| Volumen | 29 |
| Número | 1-2 |
| Páginas | 121-144 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2002-08-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Historiographia Linguistica (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0302-5160 • E-ISSN: 1569-9781 |
| Editorial | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/hl.29.1-2.09lah |
| OpenAlex | W4210368962 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 11 |
Recently, it has been suggested that Valentin Vološinov (1895-1936) plagiarised Ernst Cassirer (1874-1945). This claim is to be seen as grossly overstated, although Vološinov obviously benefited from Cassirer's work on language. This article compares Vološinov's and Cassirer's concepts of the sign and discusses their views concerning the relation between language and reality. There are fundamental differences between their views on the nature of the sign which mainly stem from the fact that they are committed to different philosophical paradigms. Thus, the validity of the claims according to which philosophical sources of the dialogical conception of the sign can be found in Cassirer's works should be seriously questioned
Dialogical self · Epistemology · Ethnology · Humanities · Relation (database · Sign (mathematics · Sociology · Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Mathematics · Philosophical and Historical Studies · Philosophy · Philosophy, Science, and History
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,05 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2006 - 2006 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |