Non-Canonical Subjects in the Prakrit of Kōūhala's Līlāvaī
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3962009 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Andrew Ollett (0000-0002-2425-2806, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 142 |
| Número | 2 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-06-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of the American Oriental Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0003-0279 • E-ISSN: 2169-2289 |
| Editorial | American Oriental Society (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.7817/jaos.142.2.2022.ar013 |
| OpenAlex | W4288464155 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
Kōūhala's Līlāvaī, a romance in Prakrit verse from around 800 CE, has two types of constructions that present "syntactical difficulties" (according to the text's first editor): the use of mhi (I am) in the meaning of maē (by me), and the use of amhēhi (by us) and tumhēhi (by you) in the meanings of amhē (we) and tumhē (you). This article reviews the phenomena and puts them into the context of expressions of agency in related Indic languages, arguing that Prakrit's split ergativity is implicated in both cases. A further conclusion is that the particle hi is all but absent from Kōūhala's Prakrit
Agency (philosophy) · Archaeology · Art · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Meaning (existential) · Romance · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |