Ibn Khaldun and Thucydides

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3964022
AutoresLenn Evan Goodman
Año1972
Volumen92
Número2
Páginas250
Fecha de publicación1972-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of the American Oriental Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0003-0279 • E-ISSN: 2169-2289
EditorialJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/600652
OpenAlexW2322260075
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5

Comparative study of the Muqaddimah of Ibn Khaldun and Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War reveals striking similarities not only in the methods and assumptions of the two historical thinkers, but also in the conclusions to which each was driven by his experience of history. Both men are naturalists, both empircists, both exponents of a critical approach to historiography. Yet neither is a reductionist. Both seek a lesson in history, and and both believe that the message of history is to be discovered in the careful study of historical laws revealed in the play of forces which are the expression of man's political and social nature. But beyond similarities of approach, there is a deep congruity of thought between the two authors, for both believe themselves to have glimpsed the pattern, learned the lesson of history. Both Ibn Khaldun and Thucydides have been led by their study of history to a cyclical, rather than linear view of historical process; both have been led, in developing their concepts of human and political reality, to a qualified relativism, which affords them, as I endeavor to show, a cautious but by no means pessimistic historical theodicy

Archaeology · Art · Epistemology · Expression (computer science) · Historiography · Literature · Pessimism · Philosophy of history · Political science · Politics · Reductionism · Relativism · Theodicy · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Philosophy