Military influence in foreign policy-making

Changing dynamics in North African regimes

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3979277
AutoresZoltan Barany (0000-0001-9485-1436, Department of Government, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA, autor de correspondencia)
Año2019
Volumen24
Número4
Páginas579-598
Fecha de publicación2019-07-04
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Journal of North African Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1362-9387 • E-ISSN: 1743-9345
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13629387.2018.1525004
OpenAlexW2890627084
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas25

The strong political position armed forces enjoy in authoritarian states and the high priority military elites assign to foreign affairs would lead one to believe that in North Africa – a region made up of authoritarian states with the sole, recent, and partial exception of Tunisia – generals had the political standing to exert a major influence on foreign policy decisions. This would not be a correct assumption because in this region the armed forces' political influence is actually highly variable. Of the five states analysed in this article (Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia) the military is the dominant political institution only in Algeria and Egypt. In the other three countries, the army plays a marginal political role and, by extension, possesses modest foreign policy influence. Moreover, the political clout of these armies is not constant. Since the Arab Spring the political influence of Egyptian generals has considerably increased, that of their Tunisian colleagues has marginally risen, while the status of Libya's military leaders has diminished

Authoritarianism · Democracy · Development economics · Economics · Foreign policy · Institution · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance