Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The anomaly of the verb 'give' explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3988265
AutoresSeppo Kittilä (0000-0003-3409-3615, autor de correspondencia)
Año2006
Volumen44
Número3
Fecha de publicación2006-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaLinguistics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X
EditorialWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/ling.2006.019
OpenAlexW2015292460
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas20
Referencias citadas5

‘Give’ is a very atypical trivalent verb in many ways. In the present article, an explanation for this anomaly will be proposed. The goal of the article at hand is to show that the anomaly of ‘give’ follows from its high formal transitivity, which also has a semantic basis. This means that ‘give’ shares a number of features with highly transitive two-actant clauses and thus outranks other trivalent verbs in formal transitivity in languages in which there are at least two syntactic classes of trivalent verbs. The discussed features comprise the number and marking of arguments, traits of verb morphology and verbal agreement, and the application of operations like passive and dative shift. The analysis is not applicable to all languages, but the uniformity languages display in this respect cannot be a mere coincidence. After the formal analysis, some reasons that underlie the high formal transitivity of ‘give’ will be examined

Agreement · Combinatorics · Linguistics · Transitive relation · Verb · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Analyzing Semantic Maps

    Open Access•Andrej Malchukov, Andrej L Malchukov•Linguistic Discovery•2010

  • On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Linguistic Typology•2011

  • Grammatical Voice

    Open Access•Federico Zúñiga, Fernando Zúñiga et al.•Grammatical Voice•2019

  • Parameters of Morphosyntactic Variation in Khoe‐Kwadi 1

    Open Access•Chris Collins, C A Collins et al.•Transactions of the Philological…•2025

  • How redundant is language really? Agent-recipient disambiguation across time and space

    Open Access•Dirk Pijpops, Eva Zehentner•Glossa a journal of general…•2022

  • Passing is giving

    Open Access•Wen Lu, Man-Shan Hui•Journal of Historical Linguistics•2025

  • Structural asymmetries in the representation of giving and taking events

    Open Access•Jun Yin, Gergely Csibra et al.•Cognition•2022

  • Philipp Rauth

    Elisabeth Witzenhausen•Beiträge zur Geschichte der…•2022

  • Ditransitive Constructions

    Martin Haspelmath•Annual Review of Linguistics•2014

  • Ambiguity avoidance as a factor in the rise of the English dative alternation

    Open Access•Eva Zehentner•Cognitive Linguistics•2021

  • Give as a light verb

    Open Access•Elena Martínez Caro, Jorge Arús-Hita•Functions of Language•2020

  • Cross-linguistic patterns in the lexicalisation of bring and take

    Open Access•Anna Margetts, Katharina Haude et al.•Studies in Language•2022

  • Ditransitive constructions in Akebu

    Open Access•Nadezhda Makeeva, Nadezhda V Makeeva et al.•Studies in Language•2020

  • Extra argumentality - affectees, landmarks, and voice

    Open Access•Daniel Hole•Linguistics•2006

  • Typological approaches to lexical semantics

    Open Access•Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Martine Vanhove et al.•Linguistic Typology•2007

  • K’ui tii ‘Don’t speak!’ – Morphology and syntax of commands in Ts’ixa (Kalahari Khoe) and beyond

    Open Access•A M Fehn, Anne-Maria Fehn•Linguistique et langues africaines•2024

  • Defining prototypical transitivity

    Open Access•Seppo Kittilä•Lingua•2008

  • Ditransitivity hierarchy, semantic compatibility and the realization of recipients in Korean dative constructions

    Open Access•Hanjung Lee•Journal of Linguistics•2020

  • Double object constructions and the anomalous syntax of Give in Cantonese

    Open Access•Olivia S-C Lam•Language Sciences•2014

  • Latin verbs with double accusative and their passivization

    Open Access•Maria Napoli•Pallas•2016

  • The linguistic encoding of three-participant events in Saliba

    Anna Margetts•Studies in Language•2002

  • Notes on Agentivity and Causation

    Scott Delancey•Studies in Language•1984

  • Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse

    Paul J Hopper, Scott A Thompson et al.•Language•1980

  • Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative

    Matthew S Dryer•Language•1986

Obras citantes distintas20
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2006 - 2025 (20)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 18
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae