Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Referential hierarchies and alignment

An overview

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3988425
AutoresKatharina Haude (0000-0003-1706-7060, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, autor de correspondencia), Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (0000-0003-0138-4635, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel)
Año2016
Volumen54
Número3
Fecha de publicación2016-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaLinguistics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X
EditorialWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/ling-2016-0008
OpenAlexW2352202623
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas17
Referencias citadas8

A referential hierarchy is a scalar representation of types of referents or referring expressions that are ranked according to their deictic, semantic, and/or dis- course-pragmatic properties. 1 The first representation of this kind was Silverstein ’ s (1976: 113) “ hierarchy of inherent lexical content ” , 2 which predicts tendencies of the distribution of accusative vs. ergative alignment patterns in languages with ergative traits. Silverstein ’ s suggestion was that entities high in the hierarchy are more prototypical agents and entities low in the hierarchy are more prototypical patients. The concept of referential hierarchies soon became very popular, both as a tool for explaining morphosyntactic patterns and as an object of research itself (see Comrie 1981 and DeLancey 1981 for early examples; see Bornkessel-Schlesewsky et al. 2015 for a selection of recent studies). 3 One version of Silverstein ’ s referential hierarchy is given in (1) (from Dixon 1979: 85)

Animacy · Hierarchy · Linguistics · Political science · Term (time) · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Associative plural as indexical category

    Open Access•M Daniels, Michael Daniel•Language Sciences•2020

  • The Grammar Network

    Open Access•Holger Diessel•Grammar Network•2019

  • English and Russian Genitive Alternations

    Open Access•Sergei Monakhov•Russian Journal of Linguistics•2020

  • Individuación y despersonalización en mapudungun. Una contribución al estudio de la referencialidad en lenguas amerindias

    Open Access•Lucã­a Golluscio•RASAL Lingüística•2024

  • Jerarquías referenciales y alineamiento inverso en mapudungun

    Open Access•Lucã­a Golluscio, Felipe Daniel Hasler Sandoval•RASAL Lingüística•2025

  • Alignment shift as functional markedness reversal

    Open Access•Katarzyna Janic, Charlotte Hemmings•Journal of Historical Linguistics•2021

  • Rethinking subjecthood

    Francisca Toro Varela•Journal of Latin Linguistics•2025

  • Reevaluating the etymology of Latin reflexives

    Fabian Toro, Francisca Toro et al.•Folia Linguistica•2022

  • Del proto-indoeuropeo a ipse e iste en latín arcaico

    Open Access•Verónica Orqueda, Demian Inostroza•Emerita•2021

  • Word-order variation in a contact setting

    Open Access•Chiara Naccarato, Anastasia Panova et al.•Language Variation and Change•2021

  • Argument structure constructions in competition

    Open Access•Joren Somers, Gard B Jenset et al.•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2026

  • On the nature of inverse systems

    Open Access•Linda Konnerth•Diachronica•2021

  • They saw it, onu , 它, coming

    Open Access•Luigi Talamo, Julius Steuer et al.•Linguistics•2026

  • Affectedness and Differential Object Marking in Turkish and Uzbek

    Open Access•Semra Kizilkaya, Semra Kızılkaya et al.•Linguistics•2022

  • EPPSatisfaction on Discourse Grounds

    Open Access•Ana Ojea•Syntax•2019

  • Optional and alternating case marking

    Open Access•Hilary Chappell, Jean‐christophe Verstraete•Language and Linguistics Compass•2019

  • Core intentional features in the syntactic computation

    Open Access•Ana Ojea•Lingua•2017

  • Differential Object Marking in Romance and Beyond

    Georg Bossong•New analyses in Romance linguistics•1991

  • In the Vestibule of Meaning

    Balthasar Bickel•Studies in Language•1995

  • Argument Marking in Ditransitive Alignment Types

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Linguistic Discovery•2005

  • On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Linguistic Typology•2011

  • Hierarchical Alignment in Movima

    Katharina Haude•International Journal of American…•2009

  • On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns

    Open Access•Edith A Moravcsik•Lingua•1978

  • An Interpretation of Split Ergativity and Related Patterns

    Scott Delancey•Language•1981

  • Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative

    Matthew S Dryer•Language•1986

Obras citantes distintas17
Citas por año1,89
Intervalo de citas2017 - 2026 (10)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 16
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae