Why children aren't universally successful with quantification
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3989073 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Julien Musolino (0000-0003-1345-7790, Indiana University Bloomington), Jeffrey Lidz (0000-0001-8829-1495) |
| Año | 2006 |
| Volumen | 44 |
| Número | 4 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2006-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X |
| Editorial | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ling.2006.026 |
| OpenAlex | W2047014701 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 142 |
| Referencias citadas | 15 |
This paper explores preschooler's knowledge of the linguistic principles (syntactic, semantic and pragmatic) regulating the interaction between universally quantified noun phrases and negation. Previous work has shown that 5-year-olds differ systematically from adults in the way they interpret sentences containing these elements (Musolino 1998; Musolino et al. 2000). On the basis of these results, Musolino et al. conclude that the grammar of 5-year-olds generates only a subset of the interpretations available in the adult grammar. We present here a series of experiments whose results challenge this conclusion. First, we demonstrate that under certain contextual conditions, 5-year-olds can be shown to access the same range of interpretations which characterize the adult system. Second, we show that while 5-year-olds do not differ from adults grammatically, their command of the pragmatic principles associated with the use of quantified statements is much more fragile than that of adults. We further suggest that children's immature pragmatic abilities is what gave rise to Musolino et al.'s findings in the first place. In doing so, we tie together research on grammatical development with a growing body of work on the development of pragmatic abilities and sentence processing in young children (Noveck 2001; Papafragou and Musolino 2003; Trueswell et al. 1999; Hurewitz et al. 2001). Finally, we show that our results have interesting methodological implications for the study of grammatical development
Grammar · Linguistics · Negation · Noun · Noun phrase · Sentence · Language Development and Disorders · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development
Children’s Interpretations of Numerically Quantified Expression Ambiguities
Aquisição de estruturas possessivas
Teaching and Learning Guide for
On-line processing of English which -questions by children and adults
Negation and Opposition
Expletive Negation
Antecedent-Contained Deletion
Negation
Negation and First Language Acquisition
Vagueness
Quantitative Studies of the Use of Negative (Dependent) Expressions
Intervention Effects with Negation
Negation and Alternatives
The Typology of Negation
Negation in L2 Acquisition and Beyond
Politeness
Negation and the Brain
Metonymy
Negation and Constituent Ordering
The Expression of Negation in Sign Languages
The Possible Positioning of Negation
Word Senses
Form and Function of Negative, Tag, and Rhetorical Questions
The Neurology of Negation
Scalar Implicatures
Negative Fragment Answers
Metalinguistic Negation
Counterfactuals
Negative Quantifiers
Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning
Modals and Negation
Exhaustivity in It -Clefts
Understanding Negation
Negation in Non-Standard Varieties
Constraint-Based Pragmatic Processing
Evolution of Negative Dependencies
Negation and Presupposition
Theory of Mind
Negation, Prosody, and Gesture
Language Comprehension, Inference, and Alternatives
Plurality
Calculating the Scope of Negation
Genericity
Neg-raising
Focus
Negative Polarity Illusions
Pronouns
Affixal Negation
Verbal Uncertainty
The Morpho-Syntactic Nature of the Negative Marker
Individual Differences in Processing of Negative Operators
Quantifier Spreading
Presuppositions, Projection, and Accommodation
Reference and Informativeness
Double Negation Readings
Negative Concord and the Nature of Negative Concord Items
The Negative Cycle and Beyond
Types of Negation
Negation in Event Semantics
Modified Numerals
Distributivity
Adjective Meaning and Scales
Negative Polarity Items
Event (De)composition
The Neurobiology of Lexical and Sentential Negation
Negative Predicates
Negative Polarity Items
The Role of Pragmatics in Negation Change
Cognitive Precursors of Negation in Preverbal Infants
Minimizers and Maximizers as Different Types of Polarity Items
Spatial Terms
Denial
Ironic Utterances
Metaphor
Turn-Taking
Quantification
Prosody and Meaning
Conservativity and Learnability of Determiners
What Autism Can Reveal About Every … not Sentences
Solving Learnability Problems in the Acquisition of Semantics
Quantifier Scope Ambiguities
Language Development
Heritage Languages and Their Speakers
A Developmental Investigation of Processing Costs in Implicature Production
Accessing the unsaid
The Oxford Handbook of Negation
The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics
Heritage language and linguistic theory
Children’s exhaustive readings of questions
Children's Acquisition of Homogeneity in Plural Definite Descriptions
Cross-linguistic scope ambiguity
Scope assignment in quantifier-negation sentences in early Korean-Chinese bilinguals’ grammars
Simplified grammar in both languages? On scope assignment in Q-Neg sentences in English-dominant heritage Chinese speakers
Children's interpretation of negation and quantifier scope in L3 English
Intonational effects on English scopally-ambiguous sentences
When L1 takes precedence
When pragmatics matters more for truth-value judgments
The child’s “or” construction
Disjunction across polarities
Children’s comprehension and repair of garden-path wh -questions
The kindergarten-path effect
The contexts of plausible denial
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution.
When children are more logical than adults
Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory
Semantic Interpretation In Generative Grammar
Speech, Language, and Communication
Logical form
Navigating negative quantificational space
One Frog, Two Frog, Red Frog, Blue Frog
The position of subjects
Some knowledge children dont lack
| Obras citantes distintas | 142 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 6,45 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2004 - 2026 (23) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | Sí |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 138 |