What Makes Companies Green? Organizational and Geographic Factors in the Adoption of Environmental Practices
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4040710 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Richard Florida (0000-0001-5899-7606, Carnegie Mellon University), Mark Atlas (North Carolina State University), Matt Cline (Carnegie Mellon University) |
| Año | 2001 |
| Volumen | 77 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 209-224 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2001-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Economic Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0013-0095 • E-ISSN: 1944-8287 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2001.tb00162.x |
| OpenAlex | W2148044183 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 16 |
| Referencias citadas | 22 |
In this paper we advance the hypothesis that organizational factors play a key role in the adoption of environmental innovations, referred to as environmentally conscious manufacturing (ECM) practices. We distinguish among three classes of organizational factors: organizational resources, organizational innovativeness, and performance monitoring systems. The research also explores the interplay of organizational factors and spatial or geographic factors (such as proximity to customers and suppliers) in the adoption of ECM practices. We employ a structured field research design, involving “matched pairs” of plants, to address these issues. The findings confirm the hypothesis. Organizational factors matter significantly in the process of ECM adoption. Furthermore, two classes of organizational factors are particularly significant to ECM adoption: organizational resources and performance monitoring systems. Performance monitoring systems composed of quantitative goals and related metrics are a particularly key factor. The research finds that geographic or spatial factors have little effect on the adoption of ECM practices, reflecting the significant geographic distance between customers and suppliers in the sample. There may be reason to expect that geographic factors play a more significant role, but this is a subject for future research
Business · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Field (mathematics) · Geography · Knowledge management · Organizational performance · Process (computing) · Sample (material) · Computer Science · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Marketing · Sustainable Industrial Ecology · Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Enhancing our understanding of the role of environmental policy in environmental innovation
Investments, incentives, and innovation
Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis
Why we need a commitment approach to environmental policy
Clean technology adoption in the context of climate change
Troubling economic geography
On the drivers of eco-innovations
Sustainability‐oriented Innovation
Does the size of the firm matter in determining the adoption of green economy practices in India
Uneven Geographies of Organizational Practice
The Associational Economy
Essay
The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms
Tighter Bonds? Customer-Supplier Linkages in Semiconductors
Technological trajectories and R&D for environmental innovation in UK firms
The Second Industrial Divide
Changing Course
Lean and Mean
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,76 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2005 - 2025 (21) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 9 |