Happy to Unite, or Not
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4079595 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kate Abramson (Indiana University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2006 |
| Volumen | 1 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 290-302 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2006-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Philosophy Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00024.x |
| OpenAlex | W1980175559 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 11 |
At several key moments in his works, Hume draws our attention to the differences between two conceptions of philosophy. Deploying what were already then well-worn metaphors, he calls these two "species" of philosophy "anatomy" and "painting." Hume's remarks about philosophical anatomy and painting have recently given rise to a number of scholarly debates. I focus here on just one of these debates: did Hume intend to combine anatomy and painting in some of his later works? Through an examination of the evidence that has to date been adduced, I argue that we have at least one very good reason to think that such were Hume's intentions, and no good reason to suppose otherwise
Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Epistemology · Painting · Computer Science · Historical Philosophy and Science · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,16 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2007 - 2024 (18) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |