Two Models of the Criminal Justice System
An Organizational Perspective
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4084232 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Malcolm M Feeley (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1973 |
| Volumen | 7 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 407-425 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1973-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Law & Society Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3052922 |
| OpenAlex | W4256278106 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 40 |
| Referencias citadas | 17 |
Despite the scholarly and popular interest in the administration of criminal justice, there are few theoretical discussions of the process. Consequently, this paper is an attempt to develop an explicit theoretical framework by which the practices in the administration can be depicted and explained. In it I characterize the criminal justice system in terms of the theory of large-scale organizations, and then examine some of the tasks of administration in terms of established concepts and criteria supplied by this perspective. Following Etzioni, by organization I mean "social units devoted primarily to the attainment of specific goals" (1961). In this case the formal task of the criminal justice system is to process arrests, determine guilt or innocence, and in the case of guilt to specify an appropriate sanction. The major actors in the organization include the defendant, prosecutor, defense counsel, judge, arresting officer, court clerk, and to varying degrees, other persons such as witnesses, additional policemen, clerks, parole officers, court psychiatrists and social workers, and the defendants' families and friends. A system of the administration of justice, whether it is adversarial or inquisitorial, entails the key elements of organization: institutionalized interaction of a large number of actors whose roles are highly defined, who are required to follow highly defined rules and who share a responsibility in a common goal - that of processing arrests
Criminal justice · Criminology · Economic Justice · Law and economics · Organizational commitment · Organizational justice · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Fundamentals of Criminological and Criminal Justice Inquiry
Why is There So Little Criminal Justice Theory? Neglected Macro- and Micro-Level Links between Organization and Power
Citizens' Perceptions of Distributive and Procedural Injustice During Traffic Stops with Police
Defenders at Law
Toward a method for evaluating court actor influences on plea negotiations
Wrongful Convictions and Erroneous Acquittals
Hindsight bias and the practice of arrests in Poland
The politics of pretrial detention
Good governance, political experiences, and public support for mandatory sentencing
Who Said Anything About Justice? Bail Court and the Culture of Adjournment
The Limits of Reinventing Government
Front‐Footed Defense
Measuring the performance of national criminal justice systems
Plea bargaining
Criminal justice theory
Repeat Players” in a Criminal Court the Fate of Their Clients
Administration and Justice
Policing, punishment and comparative penality
Institutions of Representation
A Note on Plea Bargaining and Case Pressure
Counties in Court
Some Determinants of the Method of Case Disposition
Plea Bargains, Concessions and the Courts
Organizations, Decisions, and Courts
The Concept of Laws in Social Science
Trial by Plea Bargain
Judicial Rhetoric, Government Lawyers, and Human Rights
Local-level law enforcement
Political Theory, Policy Analysis, and the Insoluble Problems of Criminal Justice
The Juvenile Court As An Organization And Decision-Making System
Trial Courts as Organizations
How Law Thinks of Disobedience
Scientific Disputes and Adversary Procedures in Policy‐making
Negotiation and Plea Bargaining Models
Comparing Violent and Non-Violent Gang Incidents
Indonesia's Criminal Justice System
The Organization of Prosecution and the Possibility of Order
The Role of Courtroom Workgroups in Felony Case Dispositions
Social Order and Plea Bargaining in the Courtroom
Organizational Maintenance, Sensitivity to Clients, and Vulnerability
Inside Bureaucracy
Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process
The Limits of the Criminal Sanction
Justice as Fairness
Exchange and power in social life
Social control in the adversary system
In Search of Juvenile Justice
The Decision to Prosecute
The Practice of Law as Confidence Game Organizational Cooptation of a Profession
Coercion and Compliance
Courtroom Encounters
Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society
Legal Evolution and Societal Complexity
| Obras citantes distintas | 40 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,77 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1974 - 2026 (53) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 40 |