Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Two Models of the Criminal Justice System

An Organizational Perspective

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4084232
AutoresMalcolm M Feeley (autor de correspondencia)
Año1973
Volumen7
Número3
Páginas407-425
Fecha de publicación1973-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaLaw & Society Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3052922
OpenAlexW4256278106
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas40
Referencias citadas17

Despite the scholarly and popular interest in the administration of criminal justice, there are few theoretical discussions of the process. Consequently, this paper is an attempt to develop an explicit theoretical framework by which the practices in the administration can be depicted and explained. In it I characterize the criminal justice system in terms of the theory of large-scale organizations, and then examine some of the tasks of administration in terms of established concepts and criteria supplied by this perspective. Following Etzioni, by organization I mean "social units devoted primarily to the attainment of specific goals" (1961). In this case the formal task of the criminal justice system is to process arrests, determine guilt or innocence, and in the case of guilt to specify an appropriate sanction. The major actors in the organization include the defendant, prosecutor, defense counsel, judge, arresting officer, court clerk, and to varying degrees, other persons such as witnesses, additional policemen, clerks, parole officers, court psychiatrists and social workers, and the defendants' families and friends. A system of the administration of justice, whether it is adversarial or inquisitorial, entails the key elements of organization: institutionalized interaction of a large number of actors whose roles are highly defined, who are required to follow highly defined rules and who share a responsibility in a common goal - that of processing arrests

Criminal justice · Criminology · Economic Justice · Law and economics · Organizational commitment · Organizational justice · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Fundamentals of Criminological and Criminal Justice Inquiry

    Open Access•Daniel P Mears, Joshua C Cochran•Fundamentals of Criminological…•2019

  • Why is There So Little Criminal Justice Theory? Neglected Macro- and Micro-Level Links between Organization and Power

    Open Access•J Hagan•Journal of Research in Crime and…•1989

  • Citizens' Perceptions of Distributive and Procedural Injustice During Traffic Stops with Police

    Open Access•Robin S Engel•Journal of Research in Crime and…•2005

  • Defenders at Law

    Open Access•Vitor Sousa Gonçalves, Livia Lages et al.•Crime Law and Social Change•2023

  • Toward a method for evaluating court actor influences on plea negotiations

    Open Access•Christi Metcalfe•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2021

  • Wrongful Convictions and Erroneous Acquittals

    Open Access•Howard Williamson, Mai Sato et al.•International Journal of Offender…•2023

  • Hindsight bias and the practice of arrests in Poland

    Open Access•Barbara Janusz-Pohl, Michał Wawrzyńczak•Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i…•2024

  • The politics of pretrial detention

    Open Access•Emelí Lönnqvist•Punishment & Society•2024

  • Good governance, political experiences, and public support for mandatory sentencing

    Open Access•Jody Sundt, Kathryn Schwaeble et al.•Punishment & Society•2017

  • Who Said Anything About Justice? Bail Court and the Culture of Adjournment

    Open Access•Nicole M Myers•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2015

  • The Limits of Reinventing Government

    Open Access•Gregory D Russell, Robert J Waste•The American Review of Public…•1998

  • Front‐Footed Defense

    Open Access•Chengchen He, Enshen Li et al.•Law & Policy•2026

  • Measuring the performance of national criminal justice systems

    E R Maguire, Gregory J Howard et al.•International Journal of…•1998

  • Plea bargaining

    Open Access•Peter F Nardulli•Journal of Criminal Justice•1978

  • Criminal justice theory

    Open Access•Cecil L Willis•Journal of Criminal Justice•1983

  • Repeat Players” in a Criminal Court the Fate of Their Clients

    Open Access•Charles D Phillips, Sheldon Ekland-Olson et al.•Criminology•1982

  • Administration and Justice

    Open Access•K Farr, KATHRYN ANN FARR•Criminology•1984

  • Policing, punishment and comparative penality

    Open Access•Tim Newburn, Trevor Jones•The British Journal of Criminology•2022

  • Institutions of Representation

    Open Access•Leon H Mayhew•Law & Society Review•1975

  • A Note on Plea Bargaining and Case Pressure

    Open Access•Milton Heumann•Law & Society Review•1975

  • Counties in Court

    Open Access•Wayne N Welsh, Henry N Pontell•Law & Society Review•1991

  • Some Determinants of the Method of Case Disposition

    Open Access•Lynn Mather, Lynn M Mather•Law & Society Review•1974

  • Plea Bargains, Concessions and the Courts

    Open Access•Thomas Church•Law & Society Review•1976

  • Organizations, Decisions, and Courts

    Open Access•Lawrence B Mohr•Law & Society Review•1976

  • The Concept of Laws in Social Science

    Open Access•Malcolm M Feeley•Law & Society Review•1976

  • Trial by Plea Bargain

    Open Access•Debra S Emmelman•Law & Society Review•1996

  • Judicial Rhetoric, Government Lawyers, and Human Rights

    Open Access•Yoav Dotan•Law & Society Review•1999

  • Local-level law enforcement

    Lauren A Mccarthy•Post-Soviet Affairs•2014

  • Political Theory, Policy Analysis, and the Insoluble Problems of Criminal Justice

    Open Access•Robert P Rhodes•Policy Studies Journal•1974

  • The Juvenile Court As An Organization And Decision-Making System

    Thomas G Blomberg, Thomas Blomberg•International Journal of…•1977

  • Trial Courts as Organizations

    Open Access•Edward J Clynch, David W Neubauer et al.•Law & Policy•1981

  • How Law Thinks of Disobedience

    Open Access•Hadar Aviram•Law & Policy•2008

  • Scientific Disputes and Adversary Procedures in Policy‐making

    Open Access•Albert R Matheny, Bruce A Williams•Law & Policy•1981

  • Negotiation and Plea Bargaining Models

    Open Access•Albert R Matheny•Law & Policy•1980

  • Comparing Violent and Non-Violent Gang Incidents

    Open Access•Dena C Carson, Natalie Kroovand Hipple•Social Sciences•2020

  • Indonesia's Criminal Justice System

    Open Access•Aristo Pangaribuan•Asian Journal of Law and Society•2025

  • The Organization of Prosecution and the Possibility of Order

    Open Access•David T Johnson•Law & Society Review•1998

  • The Role of Courtroom Workgroups in Felony Case Dispositions

    Open Access•Christi Metcalfe•Law & Society Review•2016

  • Social Order and Plea Bargaining in the Courtroom

    Open Access•D W Maynard•Sociological Quarterly•1983

  • Organizational Maintenance, Sensitivity to Clients, and Vulnerability

    Open Access•Michael R Sosin, Michael Sosin•Sociological Quarterly•1981

  • Inside Bureaucracy

    Anthony Downs, Anthony J Downs•1967

  • Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process

    Joseph Goldstein•The Yale Law Journal•1960

  • The Limits of the Criminal Sanction

    Herbert L Packer•The Limits of the Criminal Sanction•1968

  • Justice as Fairness

    John Rawls, John F Rawls•The Philosophical Review•1958

  • Exchange and power in social life

    Peter Michael Blau•Exchange and power in social life•1986

  • Social control in the adversary system

    Open Access•Jerome H Skolnick•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1967

  • In Search of Juvenile Justice

    Open Access•Norman Lefstein, Vaughan Stapleton et al.•Law & Society Review•1969

  • The Decision to Prosecute

    Open Access•George F Cole•Law & Society Review•1970

  • The Practice of Law as Confidence Game Organizational Cooptation of a Profession

    Open Access•Abraham S Blumberg•Law & Society Review•1967

  • Coercion and Compliance

    Open Access•Malcolm Feeley, Malcolm M Feeley•Law & Society Review•1970

  • Courtroom Encounters

    Open Access•Maureen Mileski•Law & Society Review•1971

  • Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society

    Max Rheinstein, Edward Shils•Harvard Law Review•1955

  • Legal Evolution and Societal Complexity

    Richard D Schwartz, James C Miller•American Journal of Sociology•1964

Obras citantes distintas40
Citas por año0,77
Intervalo de citas1974 - 2026 (53)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 40
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae