Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Income Redistribution and Fertility Decline

A Skeptical View

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4120697
AutoresBryan L Boulier (autor de correspondencia)
Año1982
Volumen8
Páginas159
Fecha de publicación1982-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPopulation and Development Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0098-7921 • E-ISSN: 1728-4457
EditorialJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2808112
OpenAlexW2014379886
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas12

This paper reviews the microeconomic and macroeconomic evidence offered by Repetto and others in support of the hypothesis that income redistribution decreases fertility and concludes that there is no support for this proposition. Proponents of this approach argue that since fertility tends to be negatively associated with income in developing countries and in a nonlinear way a small increase in the income of a poor couple reduces fertility more than a small increase in the income of a rich couple. The nature of fertility responses to changes in exogenous variables can only be determined empirically. Repettos statistical analysis of household data from Puerto Rico and Korea in support of the theory that income redistribution reduces fertility contains important theoretical and econometric errors. 1st total household income cannot be considered an exogenous variable since the wifes hours of work and earnings are determined simultaneously with decisions about fertility. 2nd use of a per capita income measure may introduce a spurious nonlinearity into the income-fertility association. To explore the fertility-income distribution relationship using a more satisfactory specification of the fertility equation the author analyzed the socioeconomic determinants of the number of children ever born and the number of living children in a sample of women drawn from the 1973 Philippines National Demographic Survey. This analysis suggested that marginal transfers of income from the rich to the poor actually increase fertility although the increase is small. Since levels and trends in fertility and mortality and in fertility and mortality differentials by socioeconomic class can affect income distribution over time it is not possible to conclude from a simple positive correlation between fertility and income inequality among nations that reductions in income inequality reduce fertility. In addition it is difficult to determine whether the statistical association between income distribution and fertility among nations is a causal association or a spurious correlation reflecting underlying and unmeasured social and economic factors

Demographic economics · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Fertility · Political science · Population · Redistribution (election) · Redistribution of income and wealth · Skepticism · Sociology · Unemployment · Demography · Economic Growth and Productivity · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Income, Poverty, and Inequality

  • Consequences of Rapid Population Growth

    Geoffrey Mcnicoll•Population and Development Review•1984

  • The demographics of inequality

    Open Access•Pierre Pestieau•Journal of Population Economics•1989

  • The Relationship Between Poverty and Fertility in Some Less Developed Countries

    Open Access•PEGGY TEO CHEOK CHIN•Singapore Journal of Tropical…•1985

  • Institutional Effects on Rural Economic and Demographic Change

    Geoffrey Mcnicoll, Mead Cain•Population and Development Review•1989

  • Are demographic developments influenced by social security

    Open Access•Jan H M Nelissen, Jan Nelissen et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•1988

  • Three to five main challenges to demographic research

    Open Access•George J Stolnitz•Demography•1983

  • An economic analysis of Chinese fertility behavior

    Open Access•Gordon G Liu, Tetsuji Yamada et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1996

  • Testing the Quantity-Quality Fertility Model

    Mark R Rosenzweig, Kenneth I Wolpin•Econometrica•1980

  • Do Sex Preferences Really Matter?

    Yoram Ben-Porath, Finis Welch•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1976

  • The interaction of fertility and the size distribution of income

    Robert Repetto•The Journal of Development Studies•1978

  • Fertility, Schooling, and the Economic Contribution of Children of Rural India

    Mark R Rosenzweig, Robert E Evenson et al.•Econometrica•1977

  • Age, biological factors, and socioeconomic determinants of fertility

    Open Access•Bryan L Boulier, Bryan Boulier et al.•Demography•1978

  • The Relevance of the Household Production Function and Its Implications for the Allocation of Time

    Robert A Pollak, Michael L Wachter•Journal of Political Economy•1975

  • A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior

    Robert J Willis•Journal of Political Economy•1973

  • The F-Connection

    Yoram Ben-Porath•Population and Development Review•1980

  • Demographic Aspects of the Size Distribution of Income

    Simon Kuznet, Simon Kuznets•Economic Development and Cultural…•1976

  • A re-estimation of the multiplying factors for the Brass technique for determining childhood survivorship rates

    T James Trussell•Population Studies•1975

  • Rural Development, Income Distribution and Fertility Decline

    Open Access•J-Cl Ch, James E Kocher•Population•1974

Obras citantes distintas7
Citas por año0,16
Intervalo de citas1983 - 1996 (14)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae