Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Investigating the Knowledge interface between Stakeholder Engagement and Plan-Making

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4138641
AutoresCrystal Legacy (0000-0002-8687-7297, The Australasian Centre for the Governance and Management of Urban Transport, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia, autor de correspondencia)
Año2010
Volumen42
Número11
Páginas2705-2720
Fecha de publicación2010-11-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEnvironment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1068/a43164
OpenAlexW2134157009
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas22
Referencias citadas53

The 'ideal deliberative procedure' provides structure to the process of stakeholder deliberation, yet creates a tension with the formal processes of strategic plan-making. This paper examines process design by drawing upon communicative planning theory, and the rational comprehensive model and deliberative democracy literature. In the context of metropolitan strategic spatial plan-making, the aim of this paper is to examine how the knowledge interface between the process of stakeholder engagement and the process of plan-making enables or inhibits implementation of the plan. A retrospective study examining the development of two metropolitan strategic spatial plans: Greater Perth's the Network City plan and Greater Vancouver's the Livable Region Strategic Plan is provided. It is revealed that the engagement of the planners, the public and the politicians occurs within formal stakeholder engagement 'events' positioned at different stages of the plan-making process. This paper reveals that the deliberation among the professional planners and the politicians at the process design stage steers the plan-making process in a manner that retains its legitimacy and creates a more implementable plan

Business · Deliberation · Geography · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Process management · Public relations · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Computer Science · Local Economic Development and Planning · Public Policy and Administration Research · Urban Planning and Governance

  • Strategic Planning as Governance of Long-Lasting Transformative Practices

    Open Access•Louis Albrechts•Human Smart Cities•2016

  • Stakeholder Engagement

    Open Access•Johanna Kujala, Sybille Sachs et al.•Business & Society•2022

  • An “undemocratic dilemma”? Overturning a ban on growing genetically modified canola

    Open Access•Guy M Robinson, Flavia Echánove Huacuja•Geographical Research•2026

  • Expectations and realities of digital public spaces

    Open Access•Ian Mcshane, Bhavna Middha•Articulo – revue de sciences…•2021

  • Should Planners Create Hierarchies of Evidence? Learning from Health and Choosing Our Own Path

    Laura E Tate•Planning Theory & Practice•2020

  • Getting Public Transport Networked

    Shaohua Hu, Sophie Sturup•Urban Policy and Research•2025

  • Towards a cycle-friendly city? civic-driven mobility reform in Kyiv under conditions of institutional fragility

    Open Access•Anastasiia Zhokhova, Magdalena Belof•Planning Practice and Research•2026

  • Instrumental and normative perspectives on non-compliance with urban planning and development regulations in Ghana

    Open Access•Prince Aboagye Anokye, Stephen Biliyitorb Liwur et al.•Land Use Policy•2026

  • Multiscalar Deliberative Transportation Planning

    Rosalie Singerman Ray•Journal of the American Planning…•2022

  • Is there a crisis of participatory planning

    Open Access•Crystal Legacy•Planning Theory•2016

  • Mainstreaming deliberative principles in Environmental Impact Assessment

    Open Access•Claudia Benham, Claudia F Benham et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2018

  • Inner-group and inter-group relations in Seoul participatory planning

    Open Access•Hyunji Cho, bayan atiyyat•Asian Geographer•2022

  • Inner-group and inter-group relations in Seoul participatory planning

    Open Access•Hyunji Cho•Asian Geographer•2022

  • A city and its people

    Wesley Petite•Studies in Political Economy•2021

  • Disentangling the Governance Configurations of Strategic Spatial Plan-Making in European Urban Regions

    Eduardo Oliveira, Anna M Hersperger•Planning Practice and Research•2019

  • The Zoom Where It Happens

    Samantha Cook, Laurie Richmond et al.•Human Organization•2022

  • Indicators for Spatial Planning and Territorial Cohesion

    Ainhoa González, Gavin Daly et al.•Regional Studies•2015

  • Building urban resilience with nature-based solutions

    Open Access•Judy Bush, Andreanne Doyon•Cities•2019

  • Planning for tranquil spaces in rural destinations through mixed methods research

    Open Access•Denise Hewlett, Lorraine Brown•Tourism Management•2018

  • The financialisation of housing and the rise of the investor-activist

    Open Access•Nicole Cook, Kristian Ruming•Urban Studies•2021

  • Placing the Stakes

    Open Access•J Metzger•Environment and Planning A…•2013

  • Midcentury Modern

    Open Access•Kavi Joseph Abraham•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Rational ecology

    John S Dryzek•Rational ecology•1987

  • The Science of “Muddling Through”

    Charles E Lindblom•A reader in planning theory.•1973

  • Ends and Means in Planning

    Edward C Banfield•A reader in planning theory.•1973

  • Collaborative Planning

    Open Access•Patsy Healey•Collaborative Planning•1997

  • Unsustainable Transport

    David Banister•Unsustainable Transport•2005

  • Deliberative Democracy and the Environment

    Graham Smith•Deliberative Democracy and the…•2003

  • Urban Planning Theory Since 1945

    Nigel Taylor, Nigel P Taylor•Urban Planning Theory Since 1945•1998

  • Why Deliberative Democracy?

    Amy Gutmann, D F Thompson et al.•Why Deliberative Democracy?•2004

  • Architectures of Knowledge

    Ash Amin, Patrick Cohendet•Architectures of Knowledge•2004

  • Collaborative Planning

    Open Access•Patsy Healey•Collaborative Planning•2006

  • Difference as a Resource for Democratic Communication

    Iris Marion Young•Deliberative Democracy•1997

  • Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined

    Open Access•Louis Albrechts•Environment and Planning B…•2004

  • Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy

    Joshua Cohen•Deliberative Democracy•1997

  • A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation

    Ikujiro Nonaka•Organization Science•1994

  • The reflective practitioner

    Donald A Schon•The reflective practitioner•1991

  • Moral consciousness and communicative action

    Jürgen Habermas•Moral consciousness and…•1990

  • Personal Knowledge

    Michael Polanyi, Mary Jo Nye•Personal Knowledge•2015

  • One Three Normative Models of Democracy

    Jürgen Habermas•Democracy and Difference•1996

  • Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy

    Jonathan E Pike, Derek Matravers et al.•Debates in Contemporary Political…•2005

  • The Chinese Communist Party and Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Ethan J Leib•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2005

  • Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Scope

    Open Access•Will Friedman•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2006

  • Inclusion and Democracy

    Iris Marion Young•Readings in Planning Theory•2015

  • Rethinking Green Politics

    John Barry•Rethinking Green Politics•1999

  • Discursive Democracy

    Open Access•John S Dryzek•Discursive Democracy•1990

  • The Green State

    Richard Eckersley, Robyn Eckersley•The Green State•2004

  • The Performance of Spatial Planning

    Andreas Faludi•Planning Practice and Research•2000

  • Can Network City Deliver a Sustainable Urban Future

    Carey Curtis, Tim Perkins•The International Journal of…•2006

  • Creativity as a Drive for Change

    Open Access•Louis Albrechts•Planning Theory•2005

  • Planning as Anticipation of Resistance

    Open Access•BISHWAPRIYA SANYAL•Planning Theory•2005

  • Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory

    Open Access•Yvonne Rydin•Planning Theory•2007

  • Knowing and Steering

    Open Access•Alan March, Nicholas Low•Planning Theory•2004

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Robert A Beauregard•Planning Theory•2005

  • Consensus Building

    Open Access•Judith E Innes•Planning Theory•2004

  • The Paradox of the Rational Comprehensive Model of Planning

    Open Access•Charles Hostovsky•Journal of Planning Education and…•2006

  • How to Proceed from Image and Discourse to Action

    Open Access•Louis Albrechts•Urban Studies•2001

  • The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe

    Open Access•Patsy Healey•International Journal of Urban…•2004

  • Shifts in Strategic Spatial Planning? Some Evidence from Europe and Australia

    Open Access•Louis Albrechts•Environment and Planning A…•2006

  • Collaborative Planning in Perspective

    Open Access•Patsy Healey•Planning Theory•2003

  • Institutionalist Analysis, Communicative Planning, and Shaping Places

    Open Access•Patsy Healey•Journal of Planning Education and…•1999

  • Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there)

    M S Gertler•Journal of Economic Geography•2002

  • Taking Deliberation Seriously

    Gregg Smith•Environmental Politics•2001

  • Scratching the Surface of Collaborative and Associative Governance

    Open Access•Nicholas A Phelps, Mark Tewdwr-Jones•Environment and Planning A…•2000

  • Deliberative Impacts

    Open Access•Robert E Goodin, John S Dryzek•Latin American Politics and Society•2006

Obras citantes distintas22
Citas por año1,69
Intervalo de citas2013 - 2026 (14)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 22
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae