Mag Uidhir on Performance
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4160908 |
|---|---|
| Autores | P D Magnus (0000-0002-2446-3494, University at Albany, State University of New York, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2008 |
| Volumen | 48 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 338-345 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2008-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The British Journal of Aesthetics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0007-0904 • E-ISSN: 1468-2842 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/aesthj/ayn031 |
| OpenAlex | W2133446288 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
Christy Mag Uidhir has recently argued (a) that there is no in principle aesthetic difference between a live performance and a recording of that performance, and (b) that the proper aesthetic object is a type which is instantiated by the performance and potentially repeatable when recordings are played back. This paper considers several objections to (a) and finds them lacking. I then consider improvised music, a subject that Mag Uidhir explicitly brackets in his discussion. Improvisation reveals problems with (b), because the performance-event and the performance-type are distinct but equally proper aesthetic objects
Improvisation · Artistic and Creative Research · Musicology and Musical Analysis · Theatre and Performance Studies
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |