Elite communication and affective polarization among voters
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4170140 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Hanna Bäck (0000-0002-0296-9419, Lund University, autor de correspondencia), Royce Carroll (0000-0002-3185-0329, University of Essex), Emma Renström, Emma A Renström (0000-0001-6593-2464, Kristianstad University), Alexander Ryan (0000-0002-7577-1032, Mid Sweden University) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 84 |
| Páginas | 102639 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Electoral Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0261-3794 • E-ISSN: 1873-6890 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102639 |
| OpenAlex | W4380265300 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 20 |
| Referencias citadas | 39 |
How does elite communication influence affective polarization between partisan groups? Drawing on the literature on partisan source cues, we expect that communication from in- or outgroup party representatives will increase affective polarization. We argue that polarized social identities are reinforced by partisan source cues, which bias perceptions of elite communication and result in increased intergroup differentiation. Further, we expect that the effect of such source cues is greater for voters with stronger partisan affinities. To evaluate our hypotheses, we performed a survey experiment among about 1300 voters in Sweden. Our analyses show that individuals who received a factual political message with a source cue from an in- or outgroup representative exhibited higher affective polarization, especially when they already held strong partisan affinities. This suggests that political elites can increase affective polarization by reinforcing existing group identities, and that this occurs in conjunction with biased interpretation of elite communication. The results improve our understanding of how political elites can influence affective polarization and add to previous research on party cues and attitude formation by demonstrating that such source cues can also increase intergroup differentiation
Elite · Outgroup · Perception · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Politics · Survey data collection · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
From political tribalism to geopolitical polarization
Discrete emotions towards leaders and partisan affect
Determinants of Affective Polarization in Mexico's 2018 Presidential Election
Putting the affect into affective polarisation
Attitude Formation Based on Political Views
When Opinions Polarize Without Persuasion
Regional dynamics in Nigerian politics
A Registered Report on Place-Based Resentment
Congenial messages from politicians reduce affective polarization among citizens
Identity after the ballot
Introduction
A Male Hostility Spiral? Polarized Communication among Political Elites on Social Media
Exploring the effect of personalized voting on affective polarization
Affective polarization in Europe
Climate action versus environmental protection? How far-right and environmentalist messengers shape public attitudes towards renewable energy infrastructure in forests
Threats, Emotions, and Affective Polarization
Anatomy of elite and mass polarization in social networks
Trends in Political Science Research
Beyond disdain
A Longitudinal Study on the Dynamic Relationship Between Affective Polarization and Radical Right’s Emergence
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
How Voters Decide
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Uncivil Agreement
The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust
Radical American Partisanship
The Social Self
Protecting the Ingroup? Authoritarianism, Immigration Attitudes, and Affective Polarization
Intergroup threat and affective polarization in a multi-party system
Tribalism in America
Affective Polarization in Political and Nonpolitical Settings
Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe
Negative partisanship towards the populist radical right and democratic resilience in Western Europe
The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate
How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It
Wanting What Is Fair
Ideological Tripolarization, Partisan Tribalism and Institutional Trust
Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems? Comparing Affective Polarization Towards Voters and Parties in Norway and the United States
What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization
Revisiting the Myth
Reducing Affective Polarization
Authoritarianism, Affective Polarization, and Economic Ideology
At the Nexus of Observational and Experimental Research
Sorting between and within coalitions
Affective Polarization and the Populist Radical Right
The Way we Were
Polarizing Cues
Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expression
Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives
Dimensions of Elite Partisan Polarization
The Long-Term and Geographically Constrained Effects of Campaign Advertising on Political Polarization and Sorting
Following the Party's Lead
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
I Disrespectfully Agree
Affect, Not Ideology
The case for motivated reasoning
Affective polarization in multiparty systems
Fragmented foes
| Obras citantes distintas | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 6,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 20 |