Problems and Unproblems in Soviet Social Theory

The status of sociology and philosophy in the Soviet Union is radically different from that of the physical and mathematical sciences. The sociologists and philosophers are still regarded by the government as ideologists, whereas the mathematicians and physicists are considered scientists; and the ideologist is in low repute in the Soviet intellectual community. Thirty years ago, Nikolai Bukharin observed in a remarkable essay that the cultural style of the current Soviet period would be technicism, and that the humanities and historical sciences would be relegated to the background. He believed that this "one-sidedness" was founded on the economic requirements of the time. Probably, however, the hollowness in the life of the Soviet ideologist is equally responsible for his low estate. The sociologists and philosophers are not regarded as independent thinkers; their job as ideological workers is to provide a documentation and footnoted commentary on the decisions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Young men of ability consequently tend to avoid choosing a life work in the social sciences and philosophy. Why, they say, should they sacrifice their intellectual independence at the outset of their lives

Aesthetics · Communism · Economic history · Estate · Ideology · Independence (probability theory · Period (music · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Soviet union · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · History · Law · Philosophy

• Soviet ideology and Sovietology

  Kurt Marko•Soviet Studies•1968

  Añadir item

• Between the Ethos of Science and the Ethos of Ideology

  D N Shalin•Sociological Focus•1979

  Añadir item

• Labor Turnover in the Soviet Union

  Open Access•David E Powell•Slavic Review•1977

  Añadir item