Toward adaptive water governance
The role of systemic feedbacks for learning and adaptation in the eastern transboundary rivers of South Africa
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4240260 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sharon Pollard, Edward Riddell, Eddie Riddell (0000-0002-3437-9536), Derick Du Toit, Daniel Retief, Ray Ison (0000-0001-9191-119X) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 28 |
| Número | 1 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Conservation Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087 |
| Editorial | Resilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.5751/es-13726-280147 |
| OpenAlex | W4360596963 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
This paper contributes to scholarship on adaptive water governance (AWG), following policy reforms in South Africa, through a focus on systemic feedbacks for learning and adaptation as critical aspects of AWG. We draw insights from three innovative and evolving water governance experiments. In 1998 South Africa adopted integrated water resources management (IWRM) as a transformative approach for achieving an equitable, sustainable, and decentralized stakeholder-centered water resources governance: all hallmarks of an enabling environment for a two-decade history of AWG, although not named as such. Progress in AWG is explored by using a longitudinal, evaluative exploration of three cases in two transboundary basins in South Africa, with a focus on the unfolding enabling environment for achieving sustainability and equity. Building on previous work, we present and discuss a range of enablers that are shown to function systemically to support feedbacks and build adaptive capacity and resilience in complex and uncertain river systems. In the Crocodile Basin, meta-governance arrangements that created an enabling space for collaborative experimentation and learning proved critical as feedbacks were progressively strengthened and embedded through evolving social and institutional arrangements. The enabling environment also supported a networked, blended system of stakeholder- and state-led platforms that have co-evolved through experimentation and learning. Despite progress, long-term persistence of action-learning feedbacks appears less certain in the Olifants Basin cases. We suggest that enabling meta-governance arrangements that offer an institutional home within which to embed learning is critical. The need to explore alternative networked governance arrangements and to explicitly manage for feedbacks that enhance learning at multiple scales is emphasized. We conclude with recommendations for future work on AWG, including reconciling differences between AWG and IWRM that originally framed South African reforms
Business · Climate governance · Corporate governance · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Knowledge management · Political science · Public relations · Social learning · Sociology · Stakeholder · Sustainability · Transformative learning · Water resources · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Integrated Water Resources Management · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Water resources management and optimization · Ecology
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |