Wittgenstein, Leavis, and Literature
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4271108 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Cyril Barrett (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1988 |
| Volumen | 19 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 385 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1988-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | New Literary History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0028-6087 • E-ISSN: 1080-661X |
| Editorial | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/469344 |
| OpenAlex | W2333460474 |
| Idioma | EN |
WHEN PREPARING Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief1 I wrote, in all innocence, to Professor F. R. Leavis asking him if, as he had been a friend of Wittgenstein's, he could tell me about Wittgenstein's understanding of literature, his judgment of Wittgenstein's literary merits, and so forth. I got a courteous reply, but the usual answer: Leavis did not interfere in philosophy so why should presume to interfere in literary criticism? Leavis's eccentricity was notorious, but not having met him, I thought this was rather severe, if not downright silly. Having now read his Memories of Wittgenstein I can understand his reply better.2 Perhaps this is a good point at which to start: a direct connection with the most unfavorable judgment on and literature
Art · Philosophy · Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
| Altamente citado | No |
|---|