Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

On Mandates, Realignments, and the 1984 Presidential Election

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4292003
AutoresEverett Carle Ladd
Año1985
Volumen100
Número1
Páginas1-25
Fecha de publicación1985-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPolitical Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2150858
OpenAlexW2313075724
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas8

After almost every presidential election, politicians and pundits try to discern what voters really intended to say. Of course, the most important thing about an election is its actual outcome, who got elected. But next come the competing efforts to interpret the outcome in a way favorable to one side or the other. This is neither surprising nor disturbing. Various groups and interests have stakes in the long-term course of American public policy; naturally, they choose to relate election outcomes to what they want that course to be. This continuing policy struggle gets expressed by the idea of a mandate. Who got a mandate from the voters to do what? In the pages of this journal four years ago, I discussed the Reagan-Carter election against the backdrop of the argument about what kind of a mandate the new president had won.' Rejecting both the view that Ronald Reagan's victory was the culmination of a coherent swing to the right and the view that it was nothing more than the rejection of Jimmy Carter, an unpopular incumbent, I maintained that Reagan had received a positive mandate to take the country in a new direction-but that the mandate was necessarily brittle. Its lack of firmness had three related sources: First, a more highly educated electorate, in the personality-emphasizing world of TV-centered electioneering

Argument (complex analysis) · Law and economics · Mandate · Nothing · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Sociology · Victory · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Public Administration

  • Split-Ticket Voters, Divided Government, and Fiorina's Policy-Balancing Model

    Open Access•Richard Born, Richard T Born•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1994

  • U.S. Soviet Policy and the Electoral Connection

    Open Access•Miroslav Nincic•World Politics•1990

  • Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting

    Open Access•John H Aldrich, John L Sullivan et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

  • The green vote in presidential elections

    Open Access•Frank L Davis, Albert H Wurth et al.•The Social Science Journal•2008

  • Towards a Pragmatic Presidency? Exploring the Waning of Political Time

    Open Access•Matthew Laing•Polity•2012

  • Partisan change in the Mountain West

    Open Access•Theresa Marchant-Shapiro, K David Patterson•Political Behavior•1995

  • George W. Bush, the Republican Party, and the “New” American Party System

    Sidney M Milki, Jesse H Rhodes•Perspectives on Politics•2007

  • The Occurrence and Consequences of Electoral Mandates in Historical Context

    Wayne P Steger•Congress & the Presidency•2000

Obras citantes distintas8
Citas por año0,22
Intervalo de citas1989 - 2012 (24)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae