Bioethics and Jainism

From Ahiṃsā to an Applied Ethics of Carefulness

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4313367
AutoresBrianne Donaldson (Rice University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2019
Volumen10
Número4
Páginas243
Fecha de publicación2019-04-01
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaReligions (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
EditorialMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel10040243
OpenAlexW2929912584
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas13

Although Jainism has been largely absent from discourses in bioethics and religion, its rich account of life, nonviolence, and contextual ethical response has much to offer the discussion within and beyond the Jain community. In this essay, I explore three possible reasons for this discursive absence, followed by an analysis of medical treatment in the Jain tradition-from rare accommodations in canonical texts to increasing acceptance in the post-canonical period, up to the present. I argue that the nonviolent restraint required by the ideal of ahiṃsā is accompanied by applied tools of carefulness (apramatta) that enable the evolution of medicine. These applied tools are derived from the earliest canonical strata and offer a distinct contribution to current bioethical discourses, demanding a more robust account of: (1) pervasive life forms; (2) desires and aversions that motivate behavior; (3) direct and indirect modes of harm; and (4) efforts to reduce harm in one's given context. I conclude by examining these tools of carefulness briefly in light of contemporary Jain attitudes toward reproductive ethics, such as abortion and in vitro fertilization

Bioethics · Epistemology · Harm · Medical ethics · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · History · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology