Outcomes and Processes in Economics and Anthropology
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4362427 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Indrajit Ray (0000-0002-9966-8822, University of California, Berkeley, autor de correspondencia), Isha Ray |
| Año | 2006 |
| Volumen | 54 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 677-694 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2006-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Economic Development and Cultural Change (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0013-0079 • E-ISSN: 1539-2988 |
| Editorial | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/500033 |
| OpenAlex | W2051596048 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 29 |
The premise of this article is that outcomes of economic models and process analyses of anthropology are both essential for understanding social phenomena, including those surrounding the commons. An explanation of any model outcome is invariably about process and structure—the outcomes of several models are compatible with many different causal processes. Anthropologists also pay equal attention to exclusions and inclusions, to the said as well as the unsaid. In that spirit, one must ask if models of resource management that are silent on, for example, influence or the desire for dignity implicitly suggest that these factors are less important to cooperation than economic and ecological factors. This article argues that policy advice has to take into account the explicit findings of a model as well as its silences. Finally, anthropologists are critical of economic models for their simplicity and allegedly obvious outcomes. But models of common‐pool resources can and do provide anthropologists with points of departure for their own research. Additionally, models can surprise us with counterintuitive results, especially with respect to emergent phenomena. Such results should be an invitation to anthropologists to investigate new social processes that were hitherto not anticipated
Counterintuitive · Dignity · Economics · Epistemology · LEAPS · Outcome (game theory) · Political science · Positive economics · Premise · Process (computing) · Simplicity · Social science · Sociology · Surprise · Unsaid · Computer Science · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Philosophy
Rich Forests, Poor PeopleResource Control and Resistance in Java
Development, Geography, and Economic Theory
Foundations of Human Sociality
Governing the Commons
Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources
Outline of a Theory of Practice
An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution
The Logic of Collective Action
Agricultural Involution
Coercing conservation
Economics and anthropology
Locational asymmetry and the potential for cooperation on a canal
Participatory development and empowerment
Conversations between Economists and Anthropologists
Institutions and the Free Rider
Engaging Simplifications
Images of Community
Irrigation and Cooperation
A Simple Model of Collective Action
Managing Local Commons
The Symbolic Making of a Common Property Resource
Customs in common
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2006 - 2019 (14) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |