When Is an Interview an Interview? Notes from Listening to Holocaust Survivors

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4375807
AutoresHenry Greenspan, Sidney M Bolkosky, Sidney Bolkosky
Año2006
Volumen27
Número2
Páginas431-449
Fecha de publicación2006-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPoetics Today (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0333-5372 • E-ISSN: 1527-5507
EditorialDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/03335372-2005-012
OpenAlexW2123563981
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas16
Referencias citadas2

Studies of interviewing suggest that there is a wide gulf between interviewing theory and actual practice. Regarding interviews with Holocaust survivors specifically, there have been no systematic studies of the relationships between theory and practice, nor has there been systematic assessment by other criteria of the increasingly vast archives of survivor interviews. In the absence of such studies, the authors have pursued another approach to thinking about what made for better and worse interviews with survivors. During the summer of 1998, they spoke with two groups of survivors who had been interviewed many times, for many different projects, and asked the survivors to evaluate their various interview experiences. As judged by the survivors, certain criteria did, indeed, consistently characterize the best as against the worst interviews. The authors argue that these same criteria shed light on an even more fundamental question: what makes an interview an interview at all

Active listening · Holocaust survivors · Interview · Medical education · Psychotherapist · Qualitative research · Semi-structured interview · Social science · Sociology · The Holocaust · Applied Psychology · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology