Nomination et production de sens

Le Praxème

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4385740
AutoresPaul Siblot (autor de correspondencia)
Año1997
Volumen31
Número127
Páginas38-55
Fecha de publicación1997-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaLangages (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0458-726X • E-ISSN: 1958-9549
EditorialPERSEE Program (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3406/lgge.1997.2124
OpenAlexW2018918600
IdiomaFR
Citas recibidas31
Referencias citadas2

From times immemorial, grammarians and linguists have assigned precedence to the noun over the other parts of discourse. The essentialisation of the nominal archetype, abundantly illustrated in the great mythical texts, leads numerous semantic analyses to belie the very theoretical principles which they defend. Our starting point is a reassessment of the definition of nomination, in which the noun is not viewed as designating the object named « in se », but « for us », thus nominating our relation to that object. A model of nominal significance is offered, in which praxis is viewed as bearing on meaning and in which we attempt to integrate the dialectic relationships between language and the real, whether those be inscribed in speech or mobilised through discourse

Archetype · Dialectic · Epistemology · Inscribed figure · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Nomination · Noun · Object (grammar · Praxis · Relation (database · Sociology · Theology · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Social Theory