What's wrong with business ethics

The field of business ethics is trapped between two competing and flawed conceptions of corporate responsibility. On the one hand is the shareholder value model, championed by Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman, which claims that corporations owe positive moral obligations only to their shareholders. On the other hand is the normative stakeholder theory, which claims that corporations are morally obliged to secure the interests of a broad range of groups, of which shareholders are only one. In this paper I will argue that if it is to generate a viable account of corporate moral responsibility, business ethics will need to abandon both canonical approaches and adopt a new approach based on a more concrete conception of the business corporation. At the end of the paper I sketch what such a theoretical approach would look like. The argument is not only relevant to business ethics; it also has important consequences for Michael Porter's influential approach to competitive strategy

Applied ethics · Argument (complex analysis) · Business ethics · Business model · Corporate governance · Corporate social responsibility · Corporation · Economics · Law and economics · Management · Normative · Normative ethics · Philosophy of business · Political science · Positive economics · Shareholder · Shareholder value · Sketch · Sociology · Stakeholder · Stakeholder Theory · Value (mathematics) · Ethics in Business and Education · Law

• Business Ethics and the Austrian Tradition in Economics

  Hardy Bouillon•Business ethics and the Austrian…•2011

  Añadir item

• Speaking out

  A Arvidsson

  Añadir item