Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Introduction

Revisiting André Bazin

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4389239
AutoresDouglas Smith (0000-0002-7158-8580, autor de correspondencia)
Año2013
Volumen36
Número1
Páginas1-9
Fecha de publicación2013-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaParagraph (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0264-8334 • E-ISSN: 1750-0176
EditorialEdinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3366/para.2013.0074
OpenAlexW2119050126
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas5

Andre Bazin remains the best-known film critic and theorist of the mid-twentieth century. A regular film reviewer and columnist, co-founder of Cahiers du cinema, defender of Orson Welles, champion of Italian Neo-Realism and mentor to the French New Wave, Bazin was a major figure in French film culture and beyond. 2008 marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death and of the publication of the first volume of his most influential book What is Cinema? (Qu’est-ce que le cinema?). The anniversary provided a focus for an ongoing resurgence of interest in his work, of which this special number is one example.1 Until recently, research on Bazin has been hampered by three factors. First, only a very restricted portion of his work is available. A mere fraction of his writings (some 2600 articles in total) has been republished in French in book form, and little of this material has been translated into English. Many of the republished texts are not readily accessible: the standard current French edition of Bazin’s Qu’est-ce que le cinema? reprints only twenty-six of the sixty-three essays published in the first four-volume edition;2 Hugh Gray’s two-volume translation What is Cinema? also contains only twenty-six essays, albeit not the same twenty-six.3 The second factor that has dogged the reception of Bazin’s work is the currency of a simplistic version of his ideas, what Dudley Andrew and Herve Joubert-Laurencin have called ‘Bazinism’.4 Essentially, ‘Bazinism’ reduces Bazin’s work to four elements: a realist ontology, the ‘myth of total cinema’, a prescriptive aesthetics and auteur theory. First, Bazin’s realist ontology proposes that cinema as a medium is grounded in the photographic reproduction of the real.5 Second, the history of the medium is driven by a longstanding human impulse to represent reality as fully as possible (the ‘myth of total cinema’).6 Third, the realist vocation of cinema prescribes a film aesthetics that respects spatial and temporal reality by avoiding conspicuous editing and adopting instead the techniques of deep focus

Art · Art history · Champion · Literature · Movie theater · Realism · Cinema and Media Studies · Classics · French Historical and Cultural Studies · History · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society

  • Identifying the Genre of The Journals of Musan as Ontological Affective Realism

    Open Access•Junghyun Hwang•Comparative Literature East & West•2021

  • La ontología de la imagen híbrida

    Open Access•Lourdes Esqueda Verano•Fotocinema Revista científica de…•2018

  • Rethinking Bazin

    Daniel Patrick Morgan, Daniel Morgan•Critical Inquiry•2006

  • The World Viewed

    George M Wilson, Stanley Cavell•The Philosophical Review•1974

  • M. Bazin et le temps

    Leo Carruthers•Screen•2011

  • The Imaginary Signifier

    Corona Metz•Screen•1975

  • Specters of Marx

    Jacques Derrida•Specters of Marx•2012

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,25
Intervalo de citas2018 - 2021 (4)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae