Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Is someone's mercenary another's contractor? American, British, and Russian private security companies in US and UK parliamentary debates

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4444684
AutoresMatteo Cm Casiraghi (0000-0003-0851-6311, University of Warwick, autor de correspondencia), Eugenio Cusumano (0000-0002-7349-6639, University of Messina)
Año2025
Volumen39
Número2
Páginas273-300
Fecha de publicación2025-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Relations (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0047-1178 • E-ISSN: 1741-2862
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00471178231159587
OpenAlexW4360948918
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3

Scholars disagree on whether an anti-mercenary norm exists, whether today's private military and security companies (PMSCs) fall under its scope, and whether the privatization of security erode parliamentary control over the use of force. We contribute to these debates by conducting a content analysis of parliamentary debates on PMSCs in the UK and US (2001-2019). Our results show that American and British politicians engage in a vehement, bipartisan criticism of Russian PMSCs, whose employees are consistently stigmatized as ruthless mercenaries irrespective of the activities they perform. Criticism of their own government's use of PMSCs, by contrast, is more nuanced and largely made by liberal and social democratic politicians only. These findings support the argument that an anti-mercenary norm narrowly focused on for-profit providers of combat still exists, but also highlights that its interpretation is biased by nationalism and politico-economic preferences, which shape the frequency and nature of politicians' stigmatization of private security providers

Argument (complex analysis) · Criticism · Democracy · Economics · Government (linguistics) · Law and economics · Nationalism · Neoclassical economics · Norm (philosophy) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Profit (economics) · Sociology · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Law · Military and Defense Studies · Military History and Strategy · Public Administration

  • Is the Sahel redefining its security? African agency, private military companies, and the changing face of security partnerships

    Open Access•Oluwaseyi Mike Bamigboye•Critical Military Studies•2026

  • Assessing Sandline International’s reputation as a private military company

    Open Access•Joseph Temple, J G Temple et al.•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2026

  • Insecurity, Counterterrorism and the Use of Private Military and Security Companies in Nigeria

    Open Access•Tarela Juliet Ike, Dung Ezekiel Jidong et al.•Journal of Asian and African…•2025

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año3
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae