Self-Reliance beyond Neoliberalism

Rethinking Autonomy at the Edges of Empire

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4475352
AutoresKaren Hébert (0000-0003-3233-7671, Yale University, autor de correspondencia), Diana Mincyte (0000-0003-3309-7673, Department of Social Science, New York City College of Technology, City University of New York, 300 Jay Street, N611, Brooklyn, NY 11021, USA; Department of Social Sciences and the Humanities, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus 9, Kaunas, LT 44307, Lithuania, autor de correspondencia)
Año2014
Volumen32
Número2
Páginas206-222
Fecha de publicación2014-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEnvironment and Planning D Society and Space (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0263-7758 • E-ISSN: 1472-3433
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1068/d6312
OpenAlexW2016094592
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas12
Referencias citadas38

Across scholarly and popular accounts, self-reliance is often interpreted as either the embodiment of individual entrepreneurialism, as celebrated by neoliberal designs, or the basis for communitarian localism, increasingly imagined as central to environmental and social sustainability. In both cases, self-reliance is framed as an antidote to the failures of larger state institutions or market economies. This paper offers a different framework for understanding self-reliance by linking insights drawn from agrarian studies to current debates on alternative economies. Through an examination of the social worlds of semisubsistence producers in peripheral zones in the Global North, we show how everyday forms of self-reliance are mutually constituted with states and markets, particularly through interactions with labor institutions and hybrid property regimes linking individual and collective interests. We draw on empirical data from two ethnographic case studies connected by a shared colonial history and continuing local mythologies of frontier self-sufficiency: salmon fisheries in rural Alaska in the US, and agrofood economies in socialist and postsocialist Lithuania. In each site we find that although local expressions of self-reliance diverge in critical respects from neoliberal visions, these forms of everyday autonomy are nevertheless enlisted to promote market liberalization, ultimately threatening the very conditions that have long sustained semisubsistence producers' self-reliance in the first place

Agrarian society · Autonomy · China · Colonialism · Common ownership · Economics · Localism · Market economy · Marketization · Neoliberalism (international relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Vision · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law · Organic Food and Agriculture