Interpretations of Ancient Indian History
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4495918 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Romila Thapar (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1968 |
| Volumen | 7 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 318 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1968-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | History and Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303 |
| Editorial | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2504471 |
| OpenAlex | W2333287478 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 15 |
Despite the stereotypes of unchanging and her unhistorical religions and peoples, the historical writing on ancient India goes back for more than two centuries and exhibits an instructive series of changes in interpretation. The historical writings produced by European scholars, beginning in the eighteenth century, were formulated in terms of the ideological attitudes then dominant in Europe, and naturally these were significantly different from the indigenous tradition of ancient India. European ideologies entailed a set of attitudes toward India which were for the most part highly critical, though there were also some sympathetic historians. These ideologies continued to be influential even after Indian scholars began to write, since they often wrote in reply to earlier interpretations and were therefore still molded by them. It has been only in recent years that the influence of ideologies on the interpretation of Indian history has been recognized; perhaps now for the first time a history of the changing interpretations of ancient India can be written. India was by no means a country unknown to Europe. In the post-Renaissance period knowledge of and familiarity with things Indian grew with the visits of merchants, ambassadors, and missionaries from various parts of Europe to the Indian sub-continent. The accounts written by some of these visitors such as those of Sir Thomas Roe, the ambassador of James I to the Mughal court of the emperor Jahangir,' or Frangois Bernier who visited India in 1668 and was associated with the court of Louis XIV2 became the basic European source of information on India in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Some of these accounts were fairly reliable; others were a mixture of observation and a large amount of fantasy. The first serious study of India and its past began in the late eighteenth century with the work of scholars who have since been described as the Orientalists or Indologists.3 This study arose principally because the East
Ancient history · Epistemology · History · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Indian History and Philosophy · Philosophy · South Asian Studies and Conflicts
L'Inde coloniale
Finding the “Early Medieval” in South Asian Archaeology
(Re)Imagining India
Violations of Parole
Bāṇa, Vyomkesh Shastri, Stella Kramrisch
The Cosmopolitan Nationalism of Sarojini Naidu, Nightingale of India
Ever the Handmaid? A Consideration of What a Medieval Archaeology in South Asia Might Be
Writing Post-Orientalist Histories of the Third World
At the Crossroads of the Body and the Word
Taj Mahal, circulations of science, and (post) colonial present
Romesh Chunder Dutt’s Indian-English epics and epochs
Introduction
Back to basics
Provincial Pasts and National Histories
Ideology and the interpretation of early Indian history
| Obras citantes distintas | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1981 - 2026 (46) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 13 |