Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

A Turning Point in Theory of History

The Place of Hayden White in the History of Metahistory

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4496669
AutoresJorn Rusen (University of Witten/Herdecke, Emeritus, autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen59
Número1
Páginas92-102
Fecha de publicación2020-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHistory and Theory (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hith.12147
OpenAlexW3011065742
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3

This article intends to place Hayden White's reflection on the basic principles of meaning-construction in history into the historical context of modern historical studies. It first presents the self-understanding of professional historians in which they emphasize the academic (wissenschaftlichen) character of the discipline. In this way of reflection, the traditional (premodern) interpretation of history as a part of rhetoric was pushed back and replaced by methodological argumentation about the rules of research (with an emphasis on source critique). Historiography, or the presentation of the results of research in a narrative form, was not completely neglected, but was not widely recognized. After the analytical insight into the narrative form of historical knowledge, significant discussion of the principles of historical thinking dramatically changed from the issue of research to that of representation (historiography).Hayden White's Metahistory (1973) marked this change paradigmatically. It turned the shift from rhetoric to science in its contrary direction: a new turn to rhetoric was proclaimed. This new anti-turn set off a hitherto unanswered question as to how research methodology should be treated. Source critique was not refuted but did not attract significant attention. The research procedure of interpretation, in contrast, was met by a new understanding and interest: it was identified as representation by the linguistic procedures of meaning-construction. Its role as a part of historical method, however, was completely ignored.The article ends with a still unresolved problem of metahistory, namely the relationship between interpretation and representation. They are not identical, but are closely related. Their synthesis and their differences have to be systematically inquired into and reflected upon if metahistory is to step forward and engage in this task. Then the merits of White's return to rhetoric will be appreciated as well as its one-sidedness criticized, before a further step is taken

Aesthetics · Archaeology · Argumentation theory · Art · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Historiography · History of science · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Literature · Meaning (existential) · Narrative · Narrative history · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics) · Rhetoric · Sociology · White (mutation) · History · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, History, and Historiography

  • The ‘Narrative Turn’ and Its Limits

    Felix Lange•Journal of the History of…•2025

  • Analogous Characters

    Open Access•Marianne Dircksen•Akroterion•2021

  • Pursuing Historical Truth

    Open Access•Djono, Nur Fatah Abidin et al.•Education Research International•2021

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,6
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2025 (5)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae