The Media and Power in Postliberal Venezuela
The Legacy of Chávez for the Debate on Freedom of Expression
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4501467 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ewa Sapiezynska (0000-0003-2097-2520, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 44 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 199-214 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Latin American Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0094-582X • E-ISSN: 1552-678X |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0094582x16661185 |
| OpenAlex | W2476825212 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 27 |
Two narratives dominate the literature about the state of freedom of expression in postliberal Venezuela, and they have few points in common, since they depend on different conceptualizations of the notion of freedom of expression. While the traditional liberal narrative focuses on the negative freedom that prohibits state interference, the postliberal narrative is based on positive freedom that encompasses the collective right of self-realization, particularly for the previously marginalized. During the government of Hugo Chávez, the discourse of freedom of expression was renewed, placing it in the context of power relations, accentuating positive freedom, and emphasizing the role of the public and community media. The establishment of the international public channel TeleSUR has revived the 1970s debate about the right to communication and contributed to the creation of a new Latin American-ness. En la literatura predominan dos narrativas acerca del estado de la libertad de expresión en la Venezuela posliberal las que tienen pocos puntos en común porque parten de visiones distintas del concepto de la libertad de expresión. Mientras la narrativa liberal tradicional enfoca sólo en la libertad negativa que previene la injerencia estatal, la narrativa posliberal se centra en la libertad positiva que abarca la autorrealización del derecho colectivo, también de los previamente marginalizados. Durante el gobierno de Hugo Chávez el discurso acerca de la libertad de expresión se renueva, insertando el concepto en el contexto de las relaciones de poder, acentuando la libertad positiva y enfatizando el rol de los medios públicos y comunitarios. El establecimiento del medio público internacional TeleSUR revive los debates sobre el derecho a la comunicación de la década de los 70 y aporta a la creación de una nueva Latinoamericanidad
Art · Context (archaeology) · Freedom of expression · Geography · Human rights · Humanities · Narrative · Political science · Power (physics) · Sociology · State (computer science) · Cultural and political discourse analysis · Gender Studies · Law · Political Theory and Democracy · Politics and Society in Latin America
Venezuela's Bolivarian Democracy
Who Can Stop the Drums?
Four Theories of the Press
The Politics of Recognition
A Theory of Justice
Reckoning with press freedom
The Struggle to Create a Radical Democracy in Bolivia
Revolutionary Praxis in a Post-Neoliberal Era
Freedom of expression as liberal fantasy
Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece
Political clientelism and the media
Liberalism and Postliberalism in Bolivarian Venezuela
The Media in Venezuela and Bolivia
The Media and the Neoliberal Transition in Chile
Citizen Chávez
Constituent Moments, Constitutional Processes
When "No" Means "Yes to Revolution
Latin America's Radical Left in Power
Arguments about the Left Turns in Latin America
Quien habla es terrorista
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2023 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |