Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The duration of word-final s in English

A comparison of regular-plural and pluralia-tantum nouns

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4581004
AutoresMarcel Schlechtweg (0000-0001-5312-4929, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, autor de correspondencia), Greville G Corbett (0000-0002-2667-9870, University of Surrey)
Año2021
Volumen31
Número4
Páginas383-407
Fecha de publicación2021-11-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMorphology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1871-5621 • E-ISSN: 1871-5656
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11525-021-09381-x
OpenAlexW3167362054
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas87

The alveolar fricative occurs in word-final position in English in different grammatical functions. Nominal suffixes may indicate plurality (e.g.cars), genitive case (e.g.car's) or plurality and genitive case in cumulation (e.g.cars'). Further, there are the third person singular verbal suffix (e.g.she fears) and the cliticized forms of the third person singular forms ofhaveandbe(e.g.she's been lucky;she's friendly). There is also non-affixals(e.g.freeze(noun)). Against the standard view that all these types are homophonous, several empirical studies have shown that at least some of the fricatives listed can actually be differentiated in their duration. The present article expands this line of research and considers a further case, which has not been included in previous analyses: pluralia-tantum nouns (e.g.goggles). We report on a carefully controlled reading study in which native speakers of British English produced pluralia-tantum and comparable regular-plural nouns (e.g.toggles). The duration of the word-final fricative was measured, and it was found that the two do not systematically differ in this acoustic parameter. The new data are interpreted in comparison to relevant previous studies, and against the background of the similarities of pluralia-tantum and regular-plural nouns

Art · Determiner · Duration (music · Genitive case · Linguistics · Literature · Noun · Plural · Suffix · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Is morphosyntactic agreement reflected in acoustic detail? The s duration of English regular plural nouns

    Open Access•Marcel Schlechtweg, Greville G Corbett•English Language and Linguistics•2023

  • Pure Event Semantics

    Open Access•Roger Schwarzschild•Philosophical Perspectives•2024

  • Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Effects in Estonian Spontaneous Speech

    Open Access•Kaidi Lõo, Fabian Tomaschek et al.•Language and Speech•2023

  • Acoustic disambiguation of homophonous morphs is exceptional

    Open Access•Ludger Paschen•Journal of Linguistics•2025

  • Grounding semantic transparency in context

    Open Access•Rossella Varvara, Gabriella Lapesa et al.•Morphology•2021

  • Statistics for Linguists

    Bronwyn Winter, Bodo Winter•Statistics For Linguists•2019

  • Lexical Plurals

    Paolo Acquaviva•Lexical plurals•2008

  • Mixed-Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS

    Open Access•José C Pinheiro, David M Bates et al.•Mixed-Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS•2000

  • A-Morphous Morphology

    Open Access•Stephen R Anderson•A-Morphous Morphology•1992

  • Speaking

    Willem J M Levelt•Speaking•1989

  • Probabilistic relations between words

    Daniel Jurafsky, Alan Bell et al.•Frequency and the Emergence of…•2001

  • Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity

    R Harald Baayen, Harald Baayen•Yearbook of Morphology 1991•1992

  • Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation

    Alan Bell, Daniel Jurafsky et al.•The Journal of the Acoustical…•2003

  • Exemplar dynamics

    Janet B Pierrehumbert•Frequency and the Emergence of…•2001

  • The Weaver model of word-form encoding in speech production

    Open Access•Ardi Roelofs•Cognition•1997

  • A theory of lexical access in speech production

    Open Access•Willem J M Levelt, Ardi Roelofs et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1999

  • A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.

    Gary S Dell•Psychological Review•1986

  • Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English

    Open Access•Alan Bell, Jason Brenier et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2009

  • Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words

    Open Access•Marcus Taft, Kenneth I Forster•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1975

  • Word-specific phonetics

    Janet B Pierrehumbert•Laboratory Phonology 7•2002

  • Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models

    Open Access•Hannes Matuschek, Reinhold Kliegl et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2017

  • Lexical access and inflectional morphology

    Open Access•Alfonso Caramazza, Alessandro Laudanna et al.•Cognition•1988

  • Subtlex-UK

    Open Access•Walter J B Van Heuven, Paweł Mandera et al.•Quarterly Journal of Experimental…•2014

  • Explaining Phonetic Variation

    Björn Lindblom•Speech Production and Speech…•1990

  • Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing

    Open Access•Dale J Barr, Roger Levy et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2013

  • Welcome to the Tidyverse

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham, Mara Averick et al.•Journal of Open Source Software•2019

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • A Comprehensive grammar of the English language

    Geoffrey N Leech, Jan Svartvik et al.•A Comprehensive grammar of the…•1985

  • The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics

    P H Matthews•CONCISE OXFORD DICTIONARY OF…•2007

  • Differences in acoustic detail

    Marcel Schlechtweg, Melina Heinrichs et al.•Learnability of Complex…•2020

  • The Sounds of the World's Languages

    Open Access•Paul Foulkes•International Journal of…•1997

  • There is a simplicity bias when generalising from ambiguous data

    Open Access•Karthik Durvasula, Adam Liter•Phonology•2020

  • Durational correlates of English sublexical constituent structure

    Open Access•Mariko Sugahara, Alice Turk•Phonology•2009

  • Some differences between English plural noun inflections and third singular verb inflections in the input

    Open Access•LI HSIEH, Laurence B Leonard et al.•Journal of Child Language•1999

  • The ability to speak

    Open Access•Willem J M Levelt•European Review•1995

  • Token Frequency Effects in Homophone Production

    Open Access•Erin Conwell•Language and Speech•2018

  • Acoustic Correlates of Grammatical Class

    Open Access•Joan A Sereno, Allard Jongman•Language and Speech•1995

  • Do We Pronounce Quotation? An Analysis of Name-informing and Non-name-informing Contexts

    Open Access•Marcel Schlechtweg, Holden Härtl•Language and Speech•2020

  • Cut ( n ) and cut ( v ) are not homophones

    Open Access•Arne Lohmann•Journal of Linguistics•2017

  • Homophony and morphology

    Open Access•Ingo Plag, Julia Homann et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2015

  • Phonetic effects of morphology and context

    Open Access•Fabian Tomaschek, Ingo Plag et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2019

  • Special Issue

    Open Access•Ruben Van De Vijver, Fabian Tomaschek•Morphology•2021

  • Knowledge of Grammar, Knowledge of Usage

    Open Access•Susanne Gahl, Susan Marie Garnsey•Language•2004

  • Sociophonetic variation and the lemma

    Open Access•Katie Drager, Katie K Drager•Journal of Phonetics•2011

  • How linguistic and probabilistic properties of a word affect the realization of its final /t

    Open Access•Barbara Schuppler, Wim A Van Dommelen et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2012

  • Lexical frequency in morphology

    Open Access•J Hay, Jennifer Hays•Linguistics•2001

  • The duration of morphemic and non-morphemic /s/ in English

    Open Access•Thomas Walsh, Frank Parker•Journal of Phonetics•1983

  • Compounding and inflection in language impairment

    Open Access•Harald Clahsen, Mayella Almazan•Lingua•2001

  • Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features

    Open Access•Greville G Corbett•Morphology•2019

  • Probabilistic reduction and probabilistic enhancement

    Open Access•Clara Cohen•Morphology•2014

  • Phonetic detail that distinguishes prefixed from pseudo-prefixed words

    Open Access•Rachel Smith, Rachel E Baker et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2012

  • Time and Thyme Are not Homophones

    Open Access•Susanne Gahl•Language•2008

  • Time and thyme are not homophones

    Open Access•Arne Lohmann•Language•2018

  • The Sounds of the World's Languages

    Geoffrey S Nathan, Peter Ladefoged et al.•Language•1998

  • The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances

    Victoria A Fromkin•Language•1971

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2025 (5)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae