A large-scale longitudinal study indicating the importance of perceived effectiveness, organizational and management support for innovative culture
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4590800 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jane M Cramm (0000-0001-5367-3207, Erasmus University Rotterdam), Mathilde M H Strating (Erasmus University Rotterdam), Roland Bal (0000-0001-7202-5053, Erasmus University Rotterdam), Anna P Nieboer (0000-0002-9676-0607, Erasmus University Rotterdam) |
| Año | 2013 |
| Volumen | 83 |
| Páginas | 119-124 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2013-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.017 |
| PMID | 23415046 |
| OpenAlex | W2082232383 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 18 |
Teams participating in QI collaboratives reportedly enhance innovative culture in long-term care, but we currently lack empirical evidence of the ability of such teams to enhance (determinants of) innovative culture over time. The objectives of our study are therefore to explore innovative cultures in QI teams over time and identify its determinants. The study included QI teams participating between 2006 and 2011 in a national Dutch quality program (Care for Better), using an adapted version of the Breakthrough Method. Each QI team member received a questionnaire by mail within one week after the second (2-3 months post-implementation of the collaborative = T0) and final conference (12 months post-implementation = T1). A total of 859 (out of 1161) respondents filled in the questionnaire at T0 and 541 at T1 (47% response). A total of 307 team members filled in the questionnaire at both T0 and T1. We measured innovative culture, respondent characteristics (age, gender, education), perceived team effectiveness, organizational support, and management support. Two-tailed paired t-tests showed that innovative culture was slightly but significantly lower at T1 compared to T0 (12 months and 2-3 months after the start of the collaborative, respectively). Univariate analyses revealed that perceived effectiveness, organizational and management support were significantly related to innovative culture at T1 (all at p ≤ 0.001). Multilevel analyses showed that perceived effectiveness, organizational support, and management support predicted innovative culture. Our QI teams were not able to improve innovative culture over time, but their innovative culture scores were higher than non-participant professionals. QI interventions require organizational and management support to enhance innovative culture in long-term care settings
Medical education · Operations management · Organizational commitment · Organizational culture · Perceived organizational support · Political science · Public relations · Respondent · Scale (ratio · Team effectiveness · Engineering · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Health Policy Implementation Science · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology
The effects of quality improvement practices on team effectiveness
The Role of Perceived Team Effectiveness in Improving Chronic Illness Care
Sociological refigurations of patient safety; ontologies of improvement and 'acting with' quality collaboratives in healthcare
Preferences for long-term care services
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |