Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Ambiguous animals, ambivalent carers and arbitrary care collectives

Re-theorizing resistance to social robots in healthcare

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4593574
AutoresTanja Ahlin (0000-0002-2374-5326, University of Amsterdam), A Mann (0000-0001-6347-9520, University of Zurich)
Año2025
Volumen365
Páginas117587
Fecha de publicación2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117587
PMID39657516
OpenAlexW4404940304
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas28

Many countries are under pressure because of lack of healthcare staff to provide care to an increasingly aged population. Potential solutions are often sought through technological innovation, including social robots to cater to the patients' emotional needs. Despite significant financial investments in social robots, they have not been implemented at a larger scale. One reason commonly cited for this is the resistance of healthcare staff. Drawing on an ethnographic case study of a social robot Paro in an Austrian hospital, we nuance resistance to robots through the heuristic of ambivalence. We argue that the ontological ambiguity of an animal-looking robot provokes highly ambivalent reactions among healthcare staff. Additionally, these reactions are shaped by how the social robot interferes with different professions and the forms of care that they provide. Finally, we show that non-significant others, such as fellow patients, can importantly impact the (dis)use of social robots, an influence which occurs through what we call 'arbitrary care collectives

Ambiguity · Ambivalence · Health care · Mobile robot · Political science · Population · Public relations · Resistance (ecology · Robot · Social robot · Sociology · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Artificial Intelligence

  • There’s no app for healthcare staff shortages

    Open Access•Tanja Ahlin•Human Organization•2026

  • Playfulness and disruptions

    Open Access•Simone Anna Felding, Sonja Teupen et al.•Ageing and Society•2025

  • Ambivalence in Organizations

    Blake E Ashforth, Kristie Rogers et al.•Organization Science•2014

  • Sociable happiness

    Open Access•Sara Ahmed, Sara Ahmed Sayed Ali•Emotion, space and society•2008

  • Cold technologies versus warm care?

    Open Access•J Pols, Ingunn Moser•Alter•2009

  • How Users Matter

    Nelly Oudshoorn, Trevor Pinch•How Users Matter•2003

  • Emotion and management

    Open Access•Marcus Persson•The Sociological Review Magazine•2023

  • Abandoning questionnaires

    Open Access•A Mann•Nordic Journal of Science and…•2021

  • Critiques from within. A modest proposal for reclaiming critique for responsible innovation

    Open Access•A Mann, Luca Chiapperino•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2023

  • Doing digital exclusion – technology practices of older internet non-users

    Open Access•Vera Gallistl, Rebekka Rohner et al.•Journal of Aging Studies•2021

  • Staging Paro

    Open Access•Martin Chevallier•Social Studies of Science•2022

  • The co-constitution of ageing and technology – a model and agenda

    Open Access•Alexander Peine, Louis Neven•Ageing and Society•2021

  • Personalisation, customisation and bricolage

    Open Access•Grant Gibson, Claire Dickinson et al.•Ageing and Society•2019

  • Talking Pleasures, Writing Dialects. Outlining Research on Schmecka

    Open Access•A Mann, A Mol•Ethnos•2018

  • The Perceptions of People with Dementia and Key Stakeholders Regarding the Use and Impact of the Social Robot Mario

    Open Access•Dympna Casey, Eva Barrett et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Granny and the robots

    Open Access•Amanda Sharkey, Noel Sharkey•Ethics and Information Technology•2010

  • Robots responding to care needs? A multitasking care robot pursued for 25 years, available products offer simple entertainment and instrumental assistance

    Open Access•Lina Van Aerschot, Jaana Parviainen•Ethics and Information Technology•2020

  • The March of the robot dogs

    Open Access•Robert Sparrow•Ethics and Information Technology•2002

  • Robot Drama

    Open Access•Benjamin Lipp•Science Technology & Human Values•2024

  • To improve quality of life

    Open Access•A Mann•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2024

  • Ambivalence in digital health

    Open Access•Benjamin Marent, Flis Henwood et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2018

  • The Woman with the Dog

    Open Access•Simone Anna Felding, Lena Rosenberg et al.•Anthropology & Aging•2024

  • When the state and your kidneys fail

    Open Access•Sherine Hamdy, Sherine F Hamdy•American Ethnologist•2008

  • The use of technology at home

    Open Access•P Lehoux, Jocelyne Saint‐arnaud et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2004

  • Sensory and narrative identity

    C Kierans, Ciara M Kierans et al.•Anthropology and Medicine•2001

  • Is There Life on Dialysis

    Ann J Ru, Ann J Russ et al.•Medical Anthropology•2005

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae