From Reserve to Homeland
Local Identities and South African Policy in Southern Namibia
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4603377 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Reinhart Kößler (University of Münster, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2000 |
| Volumen | 26 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 447-462 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2000-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Southern African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0305-7070 • E-ISSN: 1465-3893 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/713683582 |
| OpenAlex | W1986619154 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
Reserves in Southern Namibia under South African rule stand out both for the direct rule system to which they were subjected and for their ambiguous relationship to the ethnic identities of their inhabitants. While reserves were created, above all, as reservoirs of labour power, they also acquired meaning due to the long-term attachment formed by specific groups to specific places and pieces of land. From their inception up to the 1950s, the meaning of Southern Namibian reserves was kept unclear, partly as an ideological cloak for colonial rule in the interests of the settler economy. This is exemplified by the contrasting cases of Berseba and the Krantzplatz or Gibeon reserve, usually associated with the Witbooi. The 'ethnic shift' that culminated in the homeland strategy, implemented in Namibia from the mid-1960s onwards, appeared to respond to traditional aspirations frustrated by the former dispensation, but the reality of the construction of Namaland demonstrated the ulterior aim of the South African administration to create more efficient means of control and to concentrate African populations. This led to removals that infringed on traditional claims of jurisdiction. The conflicts provoked in this way contributed decisively to the development of party politics in Southern Namibia during the 1970s. The settlement of Bondelswarts in the area around Gibeon was of particular importance in challenging Witbooi claims to jurisdiction and this conflict remained unresolved a decade after independence. It testifies to the long-term consequences of colonial state intervention into the intricacies of established group identities
Colonialism · Development economics · Ethnic group · Ethnology · Geography · Homeland · Ideology · Indirect rule · Jurisdiction · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · South African History and Culture
Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa
Re-examining Liberation in Namibia
The Lower !Garib - Orange River
A Human Being Is Free
Property killed a peace park dream
Differentiating ‘Bushmen’ From ‘Bantus’
Rehoboth Baster, Namibian or Namibian Baster? An analysis of national discourses in Rehoboth, Namibia
The Union Defence Force and the suppression of the Bondelswarts Rebellion, 1922
(Re)classificando espaços e identidades
Post-Apartheid 'Tribalism'? Land, Ethnicity and Discourses on San Subversion in West Caprivi, Namibia1
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,43 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2003 - 2023 (21) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |