Creating Bridges Between Researchers and Long-Term Care Homes to Promote Quality of Life for Residents

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4635194
AutoresSharon Kaasalainen (0000-0003-2175-6037, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,, autor de correspondencia), Jaime Williams (0009-0005-0010-6037, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada), Thomas Hadjistavropoulos (0000-0002-8586-0450, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada), Lilian Thorpe (0000-0003-2547-4205, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada), Susan Whiting (University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada), Susan J Whiting (0000-0002-7573-0425, University of Saskatchewan), Susan Neville (0000-0002-1699-6143, Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada), Juanita Tremeer (Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada)
Año2010
Volumen20
Número12
Páginas1689-1704
Fecha de publicación2010-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaQualitative Health Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1049-7323 • E-ISSN: 1552-7557
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1049732310377456
PMID20682964
OpenAlexW2118364333
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas25

Improving the quality of life for long-term care (LTC) residents is of vital importance. Researchers need to involve LTC staff in planning and implementing interventions to maximize the likelihood of success. The purposes of this study were to (a) identify barriers and facilitators of LTC homes' readiness to implement evidence-based interventions, and (b) develop strategies to facilitate their implementation. A mixed methods design was used, primarily driven by the qualitative method and supplemented by two smaller, embedded quantitative components. Data were collected from health care providers and administrators using 13 focus groups, 26 interviews, and two surveys. Findings revealed that participants appreciated being involved at early stages of the project, but receptiveness to implementing innovations was influenced by study characteristics and demands within their respective practice environment. Engaging staff at the planning stage facilitated effective communication and helped strategize implementation within the constraints of the system

Business · Focus group · Long-term care · Medical education · Process management · Psychological intervention · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Sociology · Computer Science · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Health disparities and outcomes · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Psychology · Marketing