Cross-cultural research must prioritize equitable collaboration
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4686264 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mark Urassa (0000-0003-0257-6938, National Institute for Medical Research), D W Lawson (0000-0002-1550-2615, Antioch University Santa Barbara, autor de correspondencia), Joyce Wamoyi (0000-0002-2956-8666, National Institute for Medical Research), Eshetu Gurmu (0000-0001-7487-0058, Addis Ababa University), Margaret A Gibson (0000-0001-7963-4759, University of Bristol), Purnima Madhivanan (0000-0001-7818-3394, University of Arizona), Caitlyn D Placek (0000-0002-5315-5431, Ball State University), Caitlyn Placek |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 5 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 668-671 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-03-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Nature Human Behaviour (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2397-3374 • E-ISSN: 2397-3374 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-021-01076-x |
| PMID | 33737733 |
| OpenAlex | W3136252387 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 25 |
| Referencias citadas | 10 |
Research centres in low- and middle-income countries are routinely circumvented in the production of cross-cultural research on human behaviour. Where local contributions are made, collaboration is rarely equitable and often uncredited in co-authorship. Efforts to decolonize the social sciences will remain inadequate until these norms are overturned
Economics · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Cultural Differences and Values · Evaluation and Performance Assessment
How can evolutionary and biological anthropologists engage broader audiences
Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science
Realizing the Full Potential of Big-Team Behavioral Science
Principles for increasing equity in Wash research
Developing Cross-Cultural Data Infrastructures (CCDIs) for Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences
A roadmap to doing culturally grounded developmental science
‘Grey areas’
Academic production of east Asian sinologists from the perspective of cultural psychology
Authorship conflicts in academia
Co-producing research in the context of Covid-19
Ethical Challenges of Cross-Cultural Research – The Example of a Psychological Research Project in the Andean Context
Co-producing knowledge and care in team-based fieldwork in the Covid-19 era
Construct validity in cross-cultural, developmental research
Gendered conflict in the human family
Situating the social sciences in responsible innovation in the global south
The Dual Foundations of Political Ideology Are Ubiquitous across Human Social Life
More voices are always better
Bioethics Recommendations to Increase Culturally Informed Global Health Survey Research
A review and agenda for integrated disease models including social and behavioural factors
Forest Policy Innovation at the Subnational Scale
Promoting Equitable Research Partnerships in Primatology
The globalizability of temporal discounting
Ethical budgets in (psycho-)linguistic fieldwork
Combining remote and collaborative research
Analyzing asymmetries and praxis in aDNA research
The foreign gaze
The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration
How (not) to write about global health
Most of our social scientists are not institution based… they are there for hire—Research consultancies and social science capacity for health research in East Africa
Soylent Is People, and Weird Is White
Caught between a rock and a hard place
| Obras citantes distintas | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 24 |