Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Comparison of Focus Groups on Cancer and Employment Conducted Face to Face or by Telephone

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4719941
AutoresLinda M Frazier (University of Kansas School of Medicine - Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, USA,, autor de correspondencia), Virginia A Miller (University of Kansas School of Medicine - Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, USA), Douglas V Horbelt (University of Kansas School of Medicine - Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, USA), James E Delmore (University of Kansas School of Medicine - Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, USA), Brigitte E Miller (Comprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA), Brigitte Miller (Wake Forest University), Angelia M Paschal (University of Kansas School of Medicine - Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, USA)
Año2010
Volumen20
Número5
Páginas617-627
Fecha de publicación2010-05-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaQualitative Health Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1049-7323 • E-ISSN: 1552-7557
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1049732310361466
PMID20142606
PMCIDPMC2858253
OpenAlexW2099480365
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas11
Referencias citadas29

Findings from telephone focus groups have not been compared previously to findings from face-to-face focus groups. We conducted four telephone focus groups and five face-to-face focus groups in which a single moderator used the same open-ended questions and discussion facilitation techniques. This comparison was part of a larger study to gain a better understanding of employment experiences after diagnosis of gynecologic cancer. Offering the telephone option made it easier to recruit women from rural areas and geographically distant cities. Interaction between participants occurred in both types of focus group. Content analysis revealed that similar elements of the employment experience after cancer diagnosis were described by telephone and face-to-face participants. Participants disclosed certain emotionally sensitive experiences only in the telephone focus groups. Telephone focus groups provide useful data and can reduce logistical barriers to research participation. Visual anonymity might help some participants feel more comfortable discussing certain personal issues

Business · Face-to-face · Facilitation · Focus group · Medical education · Moderation · Sociology · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Medicine · Psychology · Social Media in Health Education · Social Psychology · Marketing

  • Advancing Telephone Focus Groups Method Through the Use of Webinar

    Open Access•Eunice Chong, Adrienne Alayli et al.•Global Qualitative Nursing Research•2015

  • Methodological Aspects of Focus Groups in Health Research

    Open Access•Anja Tausch, Anja P Tausch et al.•Global Qualitative Nursing Research•2016

  • An Assessment of a Shortened Consent Form for the Storage and Research Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Spots

    Open Access•Erin Rothwell, Aaron J Goldenberg et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2017

  • Parental Perceptions of Siblings’ Grieving After a Childhood Cancer Death

    Maru Barrera, Rifat Alam et al.•Death Studies•2012

  • We don't want to talk about that”

    Open Access•Faika Zanjani, Graham D Rowles•Journal of Rural Studies•2012

  • Collecting, Managing, and Assessing Data Using Sample Surveys

    Open Access•Peter Stopher•Collecting, Managing, and…•2012

  • I Want to Feel Like a Full Man”

    Lorraine McDonagh, Elly-Jean Nielsen et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2017

  • Comparing In-Person and Remote Qualitative Data Collection Methods for Data Quality and Inclusion

    Open Access•Julie Roberts, Chinwe Onuegbu et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Veteran Perspectives on Adaptations to a VA Residential Rehabilitation Program for Substance Use Disorders During the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic

    Open Access•Kimberly Clair, Roya Ijadi‐Maghsoodi et al.•Community Mental Health Journal•2021

  • The Emotional Journey of Women Experiencing a Breast Abnormality

    Open Access•Adrian J Blow, Paul Swiecicki et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2011

  • Exploring Challenges to Telehealth Communication by Specialists in Poison Information

    Open Access•Erin Rothwell, Lee Ellington et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2012

  • Stigma in response to mental disorders

    Open Access•Kathleen M Griffiths, Yoshibumi Nakane et al.•BMC Psychiatry•2006

  • The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale

    David Cella, D F Cella et al.•Journal of Clinical Oncology•1993

  • The qualitative content analysis process

    Open Access•Satu Elo, Helvi Kyngäs•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2008

  • Prenatal Care Use Among Women of Low Income

    Open Access•Wendy Sword•Qualitative Health Research•2003

  • Doing Qualitative Research

    John Mcleod•Practitioner Research in…•1999

  • Choose Your Method

    Open Access•Helene Starks, Susan Brown Trinidad•Qualitative Health Research•2007

  • Using Written Vignettes in Focus Groups Among Older Adults to Discuss Oral Health as a Sensitive Topic

    Open Access•Mario A Brondani, Michael I Macentee et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2008

  • Descriptive Versus Interpretive Phenomenology

    Open Access•Kay A Lopez, Danny G Willis•Qualitative Health Research•2004

  • Visibility and anonymity effects on attraction and group cohesiveness

    Open Access•Martin Lea, Russell Spears et al.•European Journal of Social…•2007

  • A social identity approach to trust

    Open Access•Martin Tanis, Tom Postmes•European Journal of Social…•2005

  • Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication

    Open Access•Adam N Joinson•European Journal of Social…•2001

  • Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research

    John W Creswell, Vicki L Plano Clark•Designing and Conducting Mixed…•2017

  • Social Cognitive Theory

    Albert Bandura•Annual Review of Psychology•2001

  • Using Focus Groups With Minority Ethnic Communities

    Open Access•Lorraine Culley, N Hudson et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2007

Obras citantes distintas11
Citas por año0,73
Intervalo de citas2011 - 2025 (15)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 11
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae