Inducing collective action intentions for healthcare reform through medical crowdfunding framing
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4784650 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Krystallia Moysidou (0000-0001-9803-5081, University of Sussex, autor de correspondencia), Smadar Cohen‐chen (0000-0002-8837-3420, University of Sussex) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 333 |
| Páginas | 116090 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116090 |
| PMID | 37562245 |
| OpenAlex | W4384564454 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 57 |
As a response to the shortcomings of the U.S. healthcare system, Americans are increasingly turning to crowdfunding platforms to bankroll their health-related costs. However, although medical crowdfunding has rapidly become institutionalized as part of the U.S. healthcare financing landscape, empirical evidence on how Americans perceive its role in healthcare and the impact it might have on public attitudes is scarce. To shed more light on the above, we analyze data from one correlational and one experimental study conducted over September-November 2021. Our correlational study reveals that political orientation is associated with Americans' views on medical crowdfunding. Specifically, we find that those who self-identified as conservative perceived medical crowdfunding as a valid part of the system, and more positively than a universal healthcare system. In contrast, medical crowdfunding is perceived less positively, as hindering a system of universal and affordable healthcare by those more liberally-oriented. In our experimental study, we explore how medical crowdfunding narratives can induce social attitudes conducive to change. Specifically, we test the effect of politicized narratives (vs. control) on group efficacy and subsequently on collective action intentions for healthcare reform, as a function of political orientation. Our results show that politicized narratives might induce collective action intentions through higher group efficacy, but only among those who self-identified as conservative. Liberally-oriented individuals held high collective action intentions for healthcare reform and were not affected by the manipulation. Our work is the first to establish empirically that medical crowdfunding, when employing politicized narratives, can induce collective action intentions, but this effect is moderated by political ideology
Collective action · Framing (construction · Health care · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Public relations · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance · Law · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Psychology
A Unified Theory of Collective Action and Social Change
The end of the end of ideology.
Political Ideology
From Intentions to Actions
Beliefs About the Malleability of Immoral Groups Facilitate Collective Action
Health activism and the logic of connective action. A case study of rare disease patient organisations
Crowdfunding and global health disparities
To wish you well
Medical crowdfunding in a healthcare system with universal coverage
Beyond welfare reform
Crowdfunding a “Real-life Superhero”
More than political ideology
What is (un)fair? Political ideology and collective action
Crowdfunding as a response to Covid-19
Medical Crowdfunding and Disparities in Health Care Access in the United States, 2016‒2020
Lessons From the Long and Winding Road to Medicare for All
Beyond the Turk
Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology
News of disparity
Health Reform
A Decade of System Justification Theory
Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is! Explaining Collective Action Tendencies Through Group-Based Anger and Group Efficacy
Explaining radical group behavior
Doing 'our bit
Social exclusion at the intersections of immigration, employment, and healthcare policy
Producing a worthy illness
To me, it's my life
Fund my treatment
Getting the crowd to care
Deserving to a point
Crowdfunding our health
Framing choice
Racial and gender disparities among highly successful medical crowdfunding campaigns
Special Issue Part I
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |