Historicizing the crisis of scientific misconduct in Indian science
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4872889 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mahendra Shahare (0000-0003-0933-9791, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, autor de correspondencia), Lissa Roberts (0000-0002-9370-8467, University of Twente, autor de correspondencia), Lissa L Roberts (University of Twente) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 58 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 485-506 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | History of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0073-2753 • E-ISSN: 1753-8564 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0073275320930908 |
| PMID | 32567389 |
| OpenAlex | W3036527482 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
A flurry of discussions about plagiarism and predatory publications in recent times has brought the issue of scientific misconduct in India to the fore. The debate has framed scientific misconduct in India as a recent phenomenon. This article questions that framing, which rests on the current tendency to define and police scientific misconduct as a matter of individual behavior. Without ignoring the role of individuals, this article contextualizes their actions by calling attention to the conduct of the institutions, as well as social and political structures that are historically responsible for governing the practice of science in India since the colonial period. Scientific (mis)conduct, in other words, is here examined as a historical phenomenon borne of the interaction between individuals' aspirations and the systems that impose, measure, and reward scientific output in particular ways. Importantly, historicizing scientific misconduct in this way also underscores scientist-driven initiatives and regulatory interventions that have placed India at the leading edge of reform. With the formal establishment of the Society for Scientific Values in 1986, Indian scientists became the first national community worldwide to monitor research integrity in an institutionally organized way
Criminology · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Framing (construction · Misconduct · Phenomenon · Political science · Politics · Scientific Misconduct · Social science · Sociology · Academic integrity and plagiarism · History · Law
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |