Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The contested politics of the Asian atom

Peripheralisation and nuclear power in South Korea and Japan

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4921034
AutoresJinyoung Park (0000-0003-0261-7605, Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex, Falmer, UK), B K Sovacool (0000-0002-4794-9403, Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex, Falmer, UK, autor de correspondencia)
Año2018
Volumen27
Número4
Páginas686-711
Fecha de publicación2018-07-04
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEnvironmental Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0964-4016 • E-ISSN: 1743-8934
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09644016.2018.1439436
OpenAlexW2793248069
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas16
Referencias citadas26

South Korea and Japan have been unwaveringly committed to a nuclear-focused energy supply system despite the contested nature of that technology and the Fukushima accident in 2011. The socio-political consequences of four nuclear-related facilities (Ulju, Gyeongju, Futaba, and Rokkasho) are explored through the lens of social peripheralisation. This framework suggests that nuclear facilities will migrate to communities that are geographically remote, economically marginal, politically powerless, culturally defensive, and environmentally degraded. Nuclear infrastructures in the four cases are imposed on peripheral regions, impairing not only the structure of local economies and political power, but also creating a discriminative structure in terms of social and environmental inequality. Peripheralisation suggests a deeper dynamic by which pro-nuclear attitudes become ‘locked in’ socially and culturally so that communities come to depend on the very processes that made them peripheral. Community dynamics, subnational struggles, and contests over local power relations may determine the future of nuclear power

Development economics · Economics · Nuclear power · Nuclear weapon · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Law · Risk Perception and Management

  • Industrializing theories

    Open Access•B K Sovacool, Marfuga Iskandarova et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in household low carbon innovations

    Open Access•B K Sovacool, Matthew Lipson et al.•Energy Policy•2019

  • If it’s in our backyard

    Daisaku Yamamoto, Yumiko Yamamoto•Local Environment•2024

  • Addressing energy and mobility poverty in the Middle East

    Open Access•Dylan D Furszyfer Del Rio, B K Sovacool et al.•Local Environment•2024

  • Analysis of public attitudes towards “local agreements” on restarting nuclear power plants

    Tsuneko Nakazawa, Tomoyuki Tatsumi•Local Environment•2023

  • Social justice, fairness and exclusion in the South Korean electricity sector

    Open Access•John Dong-Yoon Kim, Eunkyoung Choi et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • When safety is relative

    Open Access•David Toke•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Rural exploitation” in solar energy development? A field survey experiment in South Korea on solar energy support in rural areas

    Open Access•Inhwan Ko•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • From framework to boundary object? Reviewing gaps and critical trends in global energy justice research

    Open Access•Katarzyna Iwińska, Aleksandra Lis-Plesińska et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • From Fukushima to fossil fuels

    Open Access•May Aye Thiri, Mihály Tamás Borsi•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Of cooks, crooks and slum-dwellers

    Open Access•Dylan D Furszyfer Del Rio, B K Sovacool•World Development•2022

  • When Nuclear Power Feels Close to Home

    Open Access•Hyorim Seo, Yong-Chan Rhee et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2026

  • Resilient peripheralisation through authoritarian communication against energy democracy in South Korea

    Su Young Choi•Environmental Politics•2021

  • Volatile Photovoltaics

    Open Access•Andrea Brock, B K Sovacool et al.•Annals of the American…•2021

  • Aiming for Achilles’ Heel

    M S Ho•Social movement studies•2023

  • Triggers for policy change

    Daniel P Aldrich, Summer Forester et al.•Environmental Politics•2019

  • Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences

    Mark Petticrew, Helen Roberts•Systematic Reviews in the Social…•2006

  • Case Study Research

    Jean Hartley•Essential Guide to Qualitative…•2004

  • Site Fights

    Daniel P Aldrich•Site Fights•2011

  • The Nuclear Peninsula

    Open Access•Francoise Zonabend•Nuclear Peninsula•1993

  • In Whose Backyard? The Wicked Problem of Siting Nuclear Waste Repositories

    Open Access•Maria Rosaria Di Nucci, Achim Brunnengräber•European Policy Analysis•2017

  • Policy mixes for incumbency

    Open Access•Paul Johnstone, Andy Stirling et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2017

  • Procedural equity and corporeality

    Open Access•Kei Otsuki•Journal of Rural Studies•2016

  • Disasters can happen to anybody

    Open Access•Kyoo-Man Ha•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2016

  • Nuclear waste and landscapes of risk

    Andrew Blowers•Landscape Research•1999

  • Containing the Atom

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff, Sang-Hyun Kim•Minerva•2009

  • From the familiar to the extraordinary

    Open Access•Karen Parkhill, Karen A Parkhill et al.•Transactions of the Institute of…•2009

  • Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research

    Open Access•Jason Seawright, John Gerring•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • A Critical Evaluation of Nuclear Power and Renewable Electricity in Asia

    B K Sovacool•Journal of Contemporary Asia•2010

  • Power, politics and environmental inequality

    Andrew Blowers, Pieter Leroy•Environmental Politics•1994

  • Hatoko Comes Home

    Open Access•Martin Dusinberre, Daniel P Aldrich•The Journal of Asian Studies•2011

  • What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for

    Open Access•John Gerring•American Political Science Review•2004

  • All Politics is Local

    Daniel P Aldrich, Tamsyn Fraser et al.•Pacific Affairs•2017

Obras citantes distintas16
Citas por año2,29
Intervalo de citas2019 - 2026 (8)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 15
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae