Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Anti-Interiority

Compulsiveness, Objectification, and Identity in Infinite Jest

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4942016
AutoresElizabeth Freudenthal (autor de correspondencia)
Año2010
Volumen41
Número1
Páginas191-211
Fecha de publicación2010-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaNew Literary History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0028-6087 • E-ISSN: 1080-661X
EditorialProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/nlh.0.0145
PMID20715332
OpenAlexW2166442330
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas5

n david foster wallace’s 1996 behemoth Infinite Jest, everyone is an addict. More precisely, everyone is a compulsive user: of crack, Demerol, booze, elite competitive tennis, M*A*S*H, household bleach. Recovering drug addict Don Gately emerges as one of the sprawling novel’s heroes, in part because of his success in recovery. Readers want to let Wallace off the hook for the cliched contradictions of workingclass identity defining Gately—his sweet naivete and brute, bearlike strength, his wide-ranging, deep insight and lack of formal education, his ability to get the uptown girl despite his downtown background— because he’s so dang likeable. Gately’s struggle to “work the program,” to apply the rules of Alcoholics Anonymous to his own life meaningfully and effectively, drive much of the novel’s emotional power. And despite the problems one may have with AA as a vehicle for healthy living, Gately’s mode of fighting addiction is the only one in the novel that actually works. In Wallace’s obsessive-compulsive, entertainmentaddled, apocalyptically consumption-based society, everyone would do well to act like Don Gately. In one example of Gately’s recovery process, he follows AA’s dictum to pray to a “higher power,” even though he has no idea who, what, where, why, or how such a power might exist. Gately “simultaneously confesses and complains” to an AA meeting that he takes one of AA’s very rare specific suggestions and hits the knees in the A.M. and asks for Help and then hits the knees again at bedtime and says Thank You, whether he believes he’s talking to Anything/-body or not, and he somehow gets through the day clean. This, after ten months of ear-smoking concentration and reflection, is still all he feels like he “understands” about the “God angle.” . . . He feels about the ritualistic daily Please and Thank You prayers rather like a hitter that’s on a hitting streak and doesn’t change his jock or socks or pregame routine for as long as he’s on the streak. W/sobriety being the hitting streak and whatnot, he explains

Aesthetics · Epistemology · Identity (music) · Objectification · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Theology · Contemporary Literature and Criticism · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Gothic Literature and Media Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology · Religious studies

  • A dissociação da autoria em literatura contemporânea

    Open Access•Bruno O S P Nogueira•Arquivos do CMD•2016

  • ‘Fog of Medication’

    Arya Suresh, Sathyaraj Venkatesan•Journal of Graphic Novels & Comics•2023

  • Is It Me or My Brain? Depression and Neuroscientific Facts

    Open Access•Joseph Dumit•Journal of Medical Humanities•2003

  • Powers of horror

    Julia Kristeva Em Português•Powers of horror•1982

  • The Illusion of Autonomy and the Fact of Recursivity

    N Katherine Hayles•New Literary History•1999

  • Our Neo-Cartesian Bodies in Parts

    Ian Hacking•Critical Inquiry•2007

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,2
Intervalo de citas2016 - 2023 (8)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae