Shopping for support
Personalisation and the New Spaces and Relations of Commodified Care for People With Learning Disabilities
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4989718 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Edward Hall (0000-0002-8228-6502, University of Dundee, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2011 |
| Volumen | 12 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 589-603 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2011-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Social & Cultural Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1464-9365 • E-ISSN: 1470-1197 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14649365.2011.601236 |
| OpenAlex | W2108738179 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 46 |
| Referencias citadas | 40 |
The 'suitable' spaces of care for people with bodies and minds of difference have been rescaled from the socio-spatial exclusion of the asylum, to collective spaces within mainstream communities, and most recently to the normalised spaces of the home, employment and public space. The mechanism facilitating the latest spatial reconfiguration in the UK is 'Personal Budgets', part of a broader 'personalisation' of neoliberal state care provision, whereby disabled people and older people take on responsibility for the management of their care within a new 'care marketplace'. The paper examines the new forms, spaces and relations of care produced within this commodified system of welfare, focusing on people with learning disabilities. In doing so, the paper argues that the new care marketplace both transforms existing relations of care and constrains collective and interdependent forms of care that many people with learning disabilities (and many others) value. In conclusion, the paper contends that the 'lack of fit' between the needs of many disabled and older people and personalised care provision demands a reconceptualisation of the dominant notion of 'active citizenship'. Les espaces «appropriés» du soin pour les personnes aux corps et aux esprits différents ont été réduits de l'exclusion socio-spatiale de l'asile dans un premier temps aux espaces collectifs dans les communautés et le plus récemment aux espaces normalisés de la maison, des lieux de travail, et de l'espace publique. Le mécanisme qui facilite le dernier réaménagement spatial dans le RU est les «budgets personnels», qui font partie d'une «personnalisation» plus générale des services du soin de l'état néolibéral, dans lesquels les gens handicapés et les personnes âgées prennent la responsabilité pour la gestion de leurs soins dans un nouveau «marché des soins». Cet article étudie les nouveaux formes, espaces, et rapports du soin produits dans ce système banalisé de l'assistance sociale en se focalisant sur les personnes avec les difficultés d'apprentissage. L'article soutien par ce moyen que le nouveau marché des soins transforme les relations existantes du soin aussi bien qu'il entrave les formes collectives et interdépendants du soin qu'apprécient beaucoup de personnes avec les difficultés d'apprentissage (ainsi que beaucoup d'autres). Pour conclure, l'article soutien que la «non-correspondance» entre les besoins de beaucoup d'handicapés et des personnes âgées d'une part et les services personnalisés du soin de l'autre exige une reconceptualisation du notion dominante du «citoyenneté active». Los espacios 'apropiados' de cuidar a gente con cuerpos y mentes de diferencia han sido revisados de la exclusión socio-espacial del asilo, a espacios colectivos entre comunidades dominantes, y más reciente a los espacios normalizados del hogar, empleo y espacio público. El mecanismo que se facilita la reconfiguración espacial más reciente en el Reino Unido es del 'presupuesto personal', parte de una personalización más amplia de la provisión de cuidado del estado neoliberal, a través del cual la gente discapacitado y la gente mayor se toman responsabilidad por el manejo de su cuidado entre una nueva 'mercado de cuidado'. El articulo se examina las nuevas formas, espaciosy relaciones del cuidado producidos entre este sistema mercantilizado del bienestar, enfocando en gente con discapacidades de aprendizaje. Al hacer eso, el articulo se discute que el nuevo mercado del cuidado se transforma las relaciones actuales del cuidado y también se obliga a las formas colectivas y interdependientes del cuidado que mucha gente con discapacidades del aprendizaje (y muchos más) valoran. In conclusión, el articulo se sostiene que la 'falta de sano' entre las necesidades de mucha gente discapacitada y gente mayor y la provisión de cuidado personalizado se demanda una reconceptualización de la noción dominante de 'ciudadanía activa'. Keywords: learning disabilitycareconsumptionethics of careinterdependencycitizenshipKeywords: difficultés d'apprentissagesoinconsommationéthique du soininterdépendancecitoyennetéKeywords: discapacidades de aprendizajecuidadoconsumoéticos del cuidadointerdependenciaciudadanía Acknowledgements Many thanks to two referees and Lorraine van Blerk for constructive and detailed comments. Notes 1 The paper uses the term 'learning disability' as this has been widely adopted in policy and academic literatures in the UK. It is recognised that internationally 'intellectual disability' is predominantly used. 2 There are approximately 1.5 million people with (a range of) learning disabilities in the UK (Mencap Citation2010). 3 In Control in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland is under development. 4 On average, those with a Personal Budget spend 10 per cent less on their care than the equivalent service provided by the local authority (Guardian Citation2010b
Appropriation · Art · Business · Citizenship · Commodification · Economics · Economy · Humanities · Mainstream · Personalization · Political science · Sociology · Elder Abuse and Neglect · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law
Factors influencing the experience of client-centeredness in flemish (Proxy) budget holders
Who is responsible for wellbeing? Shifting care responsibilities in the Canadian landscape
Deinstitutionalisation and ‘Home Turn’ Policies
Too Much, Too Little, the Wrong or the Right Kind? Negotiating Homes’ Material Stuff in the Context of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Home Visiting
Care farms as a space of wellbeing for people with a learning disability in the United Kingdom
Digital care at home
There’s a lot of places I’d like to go and things I’d like to do’
Mother of a person
Balancing care and work
Introduction
Personalisation policy in the lives of people with learning disabilities
The ‘problem’ of abuse in Ontario’s Social Inclusion Act
Is Personalization the Right Plan at the Wrong Time? Re‐thinking Cash‐for‐Care in an Age of Austerity
Changing the culture of social care in Scotland
Will Direct Payments Make Adult Residential Care more Personalized? Views and Experiences of Social Care Staff in the Direct Payments in Residential Care Trailblazers
Whose ethics of care? The geographies of live‐in elder care in China
Anticipating Technology‐Enabled Care at home
More‐than‐care
Bridging the gap between employment and social care for people with learning disabilities
Ethics of care across professional and everyday positionalities
People with intellectual disability and the digitization of services
Co‐production in peer support group research with disabled people
Disabled people negotiate gender, sexual identity and self-directed social care support in England
Like a Circle in a Spiral, Like a Wheel within a Wheel
People with intellectual disability in neoliberalizing community spaces
Geographies of care work
Gendered spaces of commoditised care
The complications of 'hiring a hubby
Listening space
Aversions to the commodification of care
Making space for belonging
Getting the crowd to care
Financialization and non-disposable women
Recognising the Time-Space Dimensions of Care
Using the 'in-between' to build quality in support relationships with people with cognitive disability
Interaction during mental health floating support home visits
Neoliberal austerity and the marketisation of elderly care
Care, pay, love
We're on the edge
Shelters and clinics
Why 'cultures of care
Repairing disability access in competitive environments
Progressive localism for an ethics of care
Placing care in times of austerity
Disabling and enabling geographies
Personalisation and Austerity in the Crosshairs
Social work and direct payments
Disability Rights and Wrongs
The Logic of Care
Spaces of social inclusion and belonging for people with intellectual disabilities
The Will to Empower
Across the water
Making space for the ‘intellectual’ in geographies of disability
Money Talks, but What Does it Say? Direct Payments and the Commodification of Care
Disability Rights and Wrongs
The Development of Direct Payments in the UK
Consumerist ideology and the symbolic landscapes of private medicine
Interpreting the ‘hidden social geographies’ of mental health
The entangled geographies of social exclusion/inclusion for people with learning disabilities
The home as a site for long-term care
Understanding the social exclusion and stalled welfare of citizens with learning disabilities
The Future Challenge for Direct Payments
I have got my life back’
I do like the subtle touch’
From medical to health geography
Friend or Foe? Towards a Critical Assessment of Direct Payments
Factors Predicting Residential Mobility Among the Recipients of the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program
Care of Empowerment? A Disability Rights Perspective
A logic of care beyond health geography
Direct Payments in England
Geography and Ethics
Geographies of Care and Responsibility
Rural mental health and social geographies of caring
Placing private health care
Caring for independent lives
New Body-Geographies
Remoralising Landscapes of Care
Community and the geography of people with intellectual disability
Geographies of care
Spaces of care in the city
Location or dis-location? Towards a conceptualization of people and place in the care-giving experience
Discriminating Customers, Responsible Patients, Empowered Users
| Obras citantes distintas | 46 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,29 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 46 |