The Precedent That Wasn't
College Hate Speech Codes and the Two Faces of Legal Compliance
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5019802 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jon B Gould (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2001 |
| Volumen | 35 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 345-392 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2001-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Law & Society Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3185406 |
| OpenAlex | W1993616391 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 54 |
This article undertakes an empirical investigation into the development and persistence of college hate speech codes, asking why so many elite institutions of higher learning either retained or created speech policies that contradicted a national series of court cases. The method is both quantitative and qualitative, looking for broad patterns of response among the schools and also explaining why individual institutions did or did not comply with the court decisions. In the end, the article not only teases out thewhyof compliance decisions but also provides a greater understanding of the relationship between legal compliance and judicial impact
Compliance (psychology · Equal Protection Clause · First amendment · Political science · Sociology · Supreme court · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Legal Issues in Education · Psychology · Social Psychology
The impact of the United States Supreme Court
Judicial policies
The Common Place of Law
The Rights Revolution
Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law
Campus Wars
The Business of State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970
Policy without Law
Zorach V. Clauson
Environmental and Structural Variables as Determinants of Issues in State Courts of Last Resort
Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead over Time? Applying Galanter's Framework to Decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1925-1988
Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court
The Hollow Hope
Dimensions of Institutional Participation
Third Parties in Litigation
The Supreme Court as a Cheerleader in Politico-Moral Disputes
Mass-Level Compliance with Public Policy
Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court
Exploring the Participation of Organized Interests in State Court Litigation
Why the Haves Don't Always Come out Ahead
Studying Courts Comparatively
The Success of Amici in State Supreme Courts
Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court
Representational Concentration and Interest Community Size
Towards a Mature Social Science
The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies
The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court
Alternative Models of Appeal Mobilization in Judicial Hierarchies
Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals
Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation
Policy Goals in Judicial Gatekeeping
Lower Court Reactions to Supreme Court Decisions
Implementing a Permissive Policy
The Public Ordering of Private Relations
Reexamining Litigant Success in State Supreme Courts
Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead
Afterword
Do The "Haves" Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970
Lower Court Checks on Supreme Court Power
Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity
Procedural Norms and Tolerance
Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts
The Mass Media and American Politics
Political Jurisprudence, the "New Institutionalism," and the Future of Public Law
Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court
The School Prayer Decisions
Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures
Legal Environments and Organizational Governance
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,25 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2006 - 2017 (12) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |